Posted By: scobleizer | Oct 22nd, 2005 @ 10:45 PM
page 1 of 1
Comments: 12 | Views: 13158
scobleizer
scobleizer
I'm the video guy
Tonight I was out to dinner with my dad, my step mom, and my son Patrick. We were waiting for a table at San Jose's Fishmarket when Steve Wozniak, co-founder of Apple Computer walked in. I'll write more on my blog about the dinner, but here's a cool math trick he taught my son and I thought I'd share it with you. I'll ink most of it, so watch for future posts.

But, he started out this way, he drew a square on a piece of paper. He then drew a grid so that there'd be 16 squares. I'll show you the grid in the next message. Then he asked my son to pick a number between 1-100.
brian.shapiro
brian.shapiro
things go on as always
scobelizer,

i remember learning  this in elementary school, they're called magic squares.
Cybermagellan
Cybermagellan
Live for nothing, or die for everything
When I was in elementary school I was horrible at math and hated it to boot. My mom bought these videos that I watched and there was a lot of patterns about if you imagine numbers in two rows vertically the next number up with the next number down is your result (Personally I thought the videos were a scam) or something like that.

Point being...Scoble watch introducing your kid to stuff like that...he'll learn patterns in mathematical life than actual math itself. I still suck at math.
Maurits
Maurits
AKA Matthew van Eerde
He memorized this square:


8

11

14

1

13

2

7

12

3

16

9

6

10

5

4

15


The columns, rows, and diagonals add to 34.

Then he added enough to each of the bolded numbers to change the total from 34 to 53.  Note there is one bold number on each row, column, and diagonal.

EDIT: Note in this square any 2x2 sub-square adds up to 34 as well.  But if you add to the bolded numbers, then this breaks.

13 + 2 + 3 + 16 is equal to 34 in this square
but
32 + 2 + 3 + 35 is not equal to 53.
Karim
Karim
Trapped in a world he never made!
scobleizer wrote:
I love programmers.


You know, I guess I must not be hard-core enough, or something, because, I'm sitting here thinking, there's going to be 97 posts dissecting "magic squares," including at least one implementation, and then the thread's going to go off on a huge tangent about how sloppy the code is, how much the implementor's language of choice sucks, etc...

...and I'm the only one wondering, uh, so how is Wozniak?  LOL

What is he up to these days? Did you guys get a chance to chat?
Maurits
Maurits
AKA Matthew van Eerde
Karim wrote:

...and I'm the only one wondering, uh, so how is Wozniak?  LOL


See the scobleizer blog post about Wozniak.  And don't hijack the thread, dang it Wink

set topic=Magic Squares
page 1 of 1
Comments: 12 | Views: 13158
Microsoft Communities