page 1 of 3
Comments: 66 | Views: 21945
scobleizer
scobleizer
I'm the video guy

I just interviewed Jean Paoli, co-inventor of XML (he usually works a few doors down from my office in building 18, so we talk often). He has been bragging to me for days now about what we just announced 22 minutes ago (that Microsoft is going to standardize its Office document formats up).

Here’s Brian Jones’ blog entry on the announcement (he works on the Office team on file formats).

Here’s the announcement covered by ZDNet/CNET’s News.com.

Here’s the interview, which I did over email this morning (he’s in France working with the team there on this announcement):
+++++++++++++++

Q: Just what did we announce today?

Jean Paoli: Today is an incredible day that I have been waiting for over many years: we are offering the Office XML file format technology behind billions of documents to customers and the industry as an international standard. Together with Apple, Barclays Capital, BP, the British Library, Essilor, Intel, NextPage, StatOil and Toshiba, we are co-sponsoring the submission to Ecma, the international standards body, of the Microsoft Office Open XML document formats. We will work together to standardize the formats for approval as an Ecma standard. Our intention is also to submit the result of the Ecma work to ISO for approval as an international standard. This is our press release and a few other documents we published on the subject (http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/ — will be up soon )

Q: Are these formats really open?

Jean Paoli: Yes, and the Standardization process will make this even more clear as we work with the committee members. Ecma International is a very respected organization and is extremely serious about openness in the standards they create and support. The technical committee that will oversee it under Ecma International is open to anyone who is an Ecma member. By working with participating companies like Apple , Barclays Capital, BP, the British Library, Essilor, Intel, NextPage, StatOil and Toshiba and other Ecma members who would want to participate, we hope to create an open standard that will enable customers, technology providers and developers around the globe to work with the Office Open XML formats without barriers, with or without Microsoft products.

Q: Do I need to sign, or agree to, any licensing agreements to use the formats?

Jean Paoli: No, for the specifications and in our work with Ecma International, we are offering a broad “covenant not to sue” to anyone who uses our formats. This is a new approach that continues our open and royalty-free approach. We think it will be broadly appealing to developers, including most open source developers. (by the way you did not have to sign anything even before this announcement.)

Q: How do I know that there isn’t some sort of hidden Microsoft agenda?

Jean Paoli: The only agenda is widespread support for the Office Open XML formats. It takes more than Microsoft to really win the trust of millions of customers for a standard technology.

You know I have always believed in the power of open formats and was really frustrated from the discussion that went on the Internet around our formats for the last 2 months. The data is always the property of the customer. It was our intent since the very beginning of our XML vision to have the maximum number of people to use XML in Office because the range of applications is so wide and universal. Documents could be integrated in so many processes, across platforms. But we wanted customers to be able to take advantage of the XML schemas they had already been developing and using, rather than pushing a new schema on them. That’s why we thought our support for custom defined schema was so critical – and now by submitting the new Office Open XML formats to Ecma International for standardization, we are providing a way for others to be able to take advantage of our support for custom defined schemas as well.

The only agenda we have is providing Office customers with the reassurance that they will be able to access their documents for generations to come. Microsoft Office will do well by expanding the use of Office in new ways. Customers and others in the industry will also benefit.

Working with Ecma to standardize the Office Open XML file formats means that the new international standard will be documented in great detail, making it an extremely stable file format. This stability delivers two main advantages: first, it enables the ability to archive billions of documents for millions of public and private-sector customers worldwide, and second, it enables partners to develop a wide set of tools and platforms, further fostering interoperability across office productivity applications and with line-of-business systems.

Q: Why is Microsoft doing this?

Jean Paoli: It is good for customers, good for the industry, and good for Microsoft. –and the formats are now mature enough to be able to do it via XML technology, without creating support problems, etc. Two years ago this month, we announced the creation of the Office 2003 Reference Schema program, where we provided documentation along with an open and royalty free license to enable companies throughout the industry to work with custom-defined schema our XML-based schemas for their own solutions. While the feedback we have been receiving on the Reference Schema program is rewardingly positive, some of our customers suggested that it might also be useful to submit the formats to a standards body, and we began to seriously think about this as we started working on Office “12,” and approach Ecma International about it this spring. By working with Ecma International as well as our fellow committee members, we hope to enable customers, technology providers, and developers around the globe to work with the formats without barriers, creating a broad ecosystem of products, applications and services that can work with the formats, whether they use Microsoft Office software or not.

Q: You must be happy today Jean?

Jean Paoli: I am extremely happy today. You know, for more than 20 years, I always believed that documents should be expressed in an open format so the data and content can be reused by anyone and any software, cross platform. Previously, the technology was not up to this challenge. Our Office XML format in 2003 was a great step, but this will be seen as a nice milestone, when the industry really received a big signal that our work was truly open for everyone to use. Today, is a great day for this vision . -Jean

DevilsRejection
DevilsRejection
addicted to rss

Trust increasing. Good thing you guys are doing.

Hope this is the start of a trend. i want to be shocked and awed like this frequently, at least until Vista rtm's.

Microsoft Offers Office Document Formats to Ecma International for Open Standardization

PARIS — Microsoft Corp. today announced it will take steps to offer the file format technology behind billions of documents to customers and the industry as an international standard. Apple, Barclays Capital, BP, the British Library, Essilor, Intel Corporation, Microsoft, NextPage Inc., Statoil ASA and Toshiba will co-sponsor a submission to Ecma International, the standards organization, of the Microsoft Office Open XML (Extensible Markup Language) document format technology. Furthermore, Microsoft will make available tools to enable old documents to capitalize on the open standard format. With Office document formats available as an open standard, customers will have even more confidence in their ability to store and manage data for the long term, with many more vendors and tools from which they can choose. The move will benefit the broader software ecosystem because software and services vendors worldwide will be able to more easily build compelling solutions that interoperate across a broad spectrum of technologies.

These global industry leaders have agreed to work together as part of an open technical committee that Ecma members can join to standardize and fully document the Open XML formats for Word, Excel and PowerPoint from the next generation of Office technologies, code-named Office “12,” as an Ecma standard, and to help maintain the evolution of the formats. The group will ask Ecma to submit the results of their collaboration to the International Organization for Standardization for approval.

Ceci est bon! Un Monde, une norme de XML....

Q&A: Microsoft Co-Sponsors Submission of Office Open XML Document Formats to Ecma International for Standardization

Standardizing the Microsoft Office Open XML formats : BrianJones

Here are two points I really want to stress:

  1. It has always been our goal to make customer data in documents more valuable to them. By working with customers and partners at ECMA, we can continue these efforts to build out the Office ecosystem and help our customers reuse their XML data across systems and applications. This effort also opens up a lot of opportunities for us as well as commercial opportunities for other companies.
  2. Some customers, particularly in the public sector, have been telling us that they would like us to take this step. They are focused on the long-term management and archiving of digital records and want to use our document formats. They have told us that they would like to see us pursue this step as a measure of goodwill toward them and their interests and we are now following through on their request.
This is great news. It's good to see that even a huge creature, such as Microsoft, can change in today's world. Let's keep it up!

Now, just standardize WPF and WCF and we'll be golden! Wink
MisterDonut
MisterDonut
The Disco Godfather
I don't know if you can standardize WPF, but you sure could standardize XAML.
PaoloM
PaoloM
Hypermediocrity
And WCF is already based on standards, so... Smiley
ZippyV
ZippyV
Fired Up
So the Office XML format will be competing with the OpenOffice format right? Great!
Beer28 wrote:
I think that's good. will this mean the end of word document format?

Not the end for backwards compatibility, but the end for using it by default.
Great news!--I'm quite impressed. Smiley

Any similar plans coming up for XPS? It seems like a logical next step to me...
BryanF wrote:
Great news!--I'm quite impressed.

Any similar plans coming up for XPS? It seems like a logical next step to me...


I thought the XPS was already submitted as a standard?

On a related note, let me make sure I have the relationship correct. XPS is a specification for ANY file format in XML, and this Office format is simply an implmentation of XPS, right?
My understanding was that XPS is under a license similar to the Office XML formats before today's announcement. Last I heard it hadn't been submitted to an international standards body to begin the process of becoming an "official" standard.

One of the ideas mentioned in the Vista printing video was that when a document was printed, it's XPS representation could also be sent to a digital archiving system. Given that one of the things that held the Office XML formats back was the need for governments to ensure archived formats would have long-term stability, my expectation is that they'd want to see a similar effort to standardize XPS. Indeed, given today's announcement, going through the standards process may become a requirement for all government documents in the near future.
jmacdonagh wrote:

On a related note, let me make sure I have the relationship correct. XPS is a specification for ANY file format in XML, and this Office format is simply an implmentation of XPS, right?


No. XPS is an XML format itself like the Office Open XML formats are.

XPS (XML Paper Specification) is basically a subset of XAML that will be used as a cross-platform fixed document format, Vista's print spooler format, and a PDL format for printers to use.

XPS is currently licensed under royalty-free terms similar to the XML formats for Office, but has not yet been submitted to ECMA or ISO.

Both XPS and the Office 12 XML formats share the same container format (Open Packaging Conventions). The OPC likewise is not standardized under ECMA/ISO though I expect it soon will be as it's required for the Office 12 formats.

I wouldn't be surprised if the XPS Reach Format (the fixed document format) is submitted to ECMA/ISO as this is expected to be cross-platform as well as used in automated processes just as Office Open XML is.

You can find info on the XPS, OPC, and Windows Media Photo specs here:

http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/downloads.mspx
Good.
Now Microsoft Office must compete based on merit rather than file format compatibility and OpenOffice.org must compete based on merit rather than "use us because our format is open". 

(From what I've seen of Office 12, Microsoft wins that battle with ease.)
PaoloM
PaoloM
Hypermediocrity
Escamillo wrote:
Good.
Now Microsoft Office must compete based on merit rather than file format compatibility and OpenOffice.org must compete based on merit rather than "use us because our format is open". 

Yeah, I can't wait to read the excuses they will have to come out when oo.o's marketshare will not have increased next year.  
sbc
sbc
GW R/Me
I'm wondering what will happen if ODF becomes an ISO standard first.

If it and Microsoft's does can it be a good thing? Or just confusing as there would be two standards that do the same thing?

I assume third parties can improve the standard in future.

MS Offer File Formats as Open Standards, Sorta Open

PaoloM
PaoloM
Hypermediocrity
sbc wrote:
I'm wondering what will happen if ODF becomes an ISO standard first.

Then there will be two standards. What's the problem?

sbc wrote:
If it and Microsoft's does can it be a good thing? Or just confusing as there would be two standards that do the same thing?

There's a lot of overlapping standards in all sorts of aspects of current living, one more won't be an issue.

Unless, of course, there's some political motive behind the backing of one over another...
sbc wrote:
I assume third parties can improve the standard in future.

By going thru the standardization process, sure.
sbc
sbc
GW R/Me
PaoloM wrote:


sbc wrote:If it and Microsoft's does can it be a good thing? Or just confusing as there would be two standards that do the same thing?

There's a lot of overlapping standards in all sorts of aspects of current living, one more won't be an issue.

So you think two standards on Office productivity formats is a good thing? They don't just overlap, the purpose of each is exactly the same.

There is a trust issue with Microsoft and it will take a lot of work to gain that trust back. I'm sure there are some that use Microsoft products begrudgingly - i.e. because everyone else does or do not know of the alternatives. It is hard to know for sure if people use the software because they want to, or because they have to.

If it weren't for the cost of the hardware, I am sure many more would use MacOSX.
PaoloM
PaoloM
Hypermediocrity
sbc wrote:
So you think two standards on Office productivity formats is a good thing? They don't just overlap, the purpose of each is exactly the same.

Not exactly, OpenDocument cannot represent all the functionality of the binary Word format, for example, while Office XML can.

If you need to faithfully convert .doc documents, OpenOffice is very much not up to the task.
sbc wrote:
There is a trust issue with Microsoft and it will take a lot of work to gain that trust back.

 Funny how pretty much every opinion poll shows that people trust Microsoft  a lot. Where do you get the impression about this lack of trust?
sbc wrote:
I'm sure there are some that use Microsoft products begrudgingly - i.e. because everyone else does or do not know of the alternatives. It is hard to know for sure if people use the software because they want to, or because they have to.

And I'm sure there are a lot of people in the opposite situation, like for example me, that had to work "begrudgingly" with Java for the last two years. But I guess those don't really count, eh?
sbc wrote:
If it weren't for the cost of the hardware, I am sure many more would use MacOSX.

Hey, The Mac mini is a very competitively priced machine that's absolutely perfect for home use.

How well did it fare in the market?

Sorry, the old "if Macs were cheaper..." or "if they only knew about the alternatives..." herrings are abused and time after time proven to be based more on articles of faith than real objective facts.

sbc wrote:

If it weren't for the cost of the hardware, I am sure many more would use MacOSX.


I'm not sure what the above statement has to do with anything, as the file formats we're talking about are OS-independent.  In fact, given that Apple is one of the backers of the Microsoft standard formats, look for Apple's software to support the formats (Mac OSX's TextEdit applet already supports Word 2003 XML format ).
PaoloM wrote:
Escamillo wrote: Good.
Now Microsoft Office must compete based on merit rather than file format compatibility and OpenOffice.org must compete based on merit rather than "use us because our format is open". 

Yeah, I can't wait to read the excuses they will have to come out when oo.o's marketshare will not have increased next year.  


While oo.o won't be able to argue "open file format" advantage anymore, they'll still be able to argue the price advantage.  The problem is that Office 12 will make oo.o look so antiquated by comparison (features, UI, and polish) that will it matter?  In fact, the lower price (free) might even just reinforce the notion that it's inferior.
blowdart
blowdart
Peek-a-boo
Escamillo wrote:

While oo.o won't be able to argue "open file format" advantage anymore,


Of course they will. Without looking at Slashdot I can see it now. "It's not really "Open" (tm)"
PaoloM
PaoloM
Hypermediocrity
blowdart wrote:
Escamillo wrote:
While oo.o won't be able to argue "open file format" advantage anymore,


Of course they will. Without looking at Slashdot I can see it now. "It's not really "Open" (tm)"

That's cheating. They did it already Smiley
rjdohnert
rjdohnert
You will never know success until you know failure
PaoloM wrote:
blowdart wrote:
Escamillo wrote:
While oo.o won't be able to argue "open file format" advantage anymore,


Of course they will. Without looking at Slashdot I can see it now. "It's not really "Open" (tm)"

That's cheating. They did it already


You shoulda known already, if its offered by Microsoft or SCO its no good and they are trying to destroy the Open Source community.  If they are adopted as standards, they are open.  I know I personally will hold off on deploying OpenOffice or StarOffice until the outcome.
sbc
sbc
GW R/Me
The only thing that make the Microsoft format not completely open is that it is not GPL friendly. I wonder if that will change in the future? Perhaps it will never be compatible, due to patents, unless GPL v3 takes that into account.

Also, who worked with Microsoft on the formats? They have co-sponsors (not as many as OpenOffice though, and some of them a probably backing both formats, just in case), but did those companies also help develop the standard or was it all done in-house by Microsoft?

I notice it may become a standard by the time Office 12 comes out, but will third-parties be able to implement it before then?

sbc
sbc
GW R/Me
PaoloM wrote:
sbc wrote:So you think two standards on Office productivity formats is a good thing? They don't just overlap, the purpose of each is exactly the same.

Not exactly, OpenDocument cannot represent all the functionality of the binary Word format, for example, while Office XML can.

If you need to faithfully convert .doc documents, OpenOffice is very much not up to the task.

What functionality does binary Word or Office XML have that OpenDocument doesn't?

Also, in some cases OpenOffice is better at opening old Office documents (pre-Office 97 I think). At least that is what I have heard some say (I don't have any documents that old to test the theory out).
page 1 of 3
Comments: 66 | Views: 21945
Microsoft Communities