Posted By: Cybermagellan | Dec 26th, 2005 @ 1:28 PM
page 1 of 1
Comments: 10 | Views: 1663
Cybermagellan
Cybermagellan
Live for nothing, or die for everything

Mom Fights Downloading Suit on Her Own

Yahoo News wrote:
"I assumed that when I explained to them who I was and that I wasn't a computer downloader, it would just go away," she said in an interview. "I didn't really understand what it all meant. But they just kept insisting on a financial settlement."

"Santangelo, 43, has been described by a federal judge as "an Internet-illiterate parent, who does not know Kazaa from kazoo, and who can barely retrieve her email."

"People say to me, `You're crazy. Why don't you just settle?' I could probably get out of the whole thing if I paid maybe $3,500 and signed their little document. But I won't do that."

" Her travail started when the record companies used an investigator to go online and search for copyrighted recordings being made available by individuals. The investigator allegedly found hundreds on her computer on April 11, 2004. Months later, there was a phone call from the industry's "settlement center," demanding about $7,500 "to keep me from being named in a lawsuit," Santangelo said."


I'm under the belief that the RIAA is now just "threatening" people for a suit. Even if they have downloaded music I think they're just running around suing people for the money.

W3bbo
W3bbo
The Master of Baiters
The **AA aren't suing downloaders, only sharers/distributers.

It's some part of copyright law, they only sue those who share files.

So if you're a BitTorrent leech or a "miser" on Livewire, you're immune from prosecution, no matter how many terabytes you download, but if you share just one byte then you're liable.
Hell yes! Everyday it seems, the music industry becomes more and more like a thuggish cartel. They may as well call the settlements they're demanding "protection money" and drop any pretence. I believe there is a place for intellectual property, but this has long since gotten way out of control.

Don't let the bsatards get you down! Mad
W3bbo wrote:
The **AA aren't suing downloaders, only sharers/distributers.

It's some part of copyright law, they only sue those who share files.

So if you're a BitTorrent leech or a "miser" on Livewire, you're immune from prosecution, no matter how many terabytes you download, but if you share just one byte then you're liable.


Can anybody explain to me this BitTorrent thing...
every time I get a new answer! (seriously)
W3bbo
W3bbo
The Master of Baiters
skkipper wrote:
Can anybody explain to me this BitTorrent thing...
every time I get a new answer! (seriously)


Here?
I'm not ashamed to admit that I download music... In fact I downloaded an entire Album yesterday... I might download some more later... </Obligatory iTunes joke>
Manip wrote:
I'm not ashamed to admit that I download music... In fact I downloaded an entire Album yesterday... I might download some more later... </Obligatory iTunes joke>


shame on you Tongue Out
W3bbo
W3bbo
The Master of Baiters
Manip wrote:
I'm not ashamed to admit that I download music... In fact I downloaded an entire Album yesterday... I might download some more later... </Obligatory iTunes joke>


Heh.

As for myself, I am in the process of converting my bittorrented albums into "the real deal" by buying the real albums in shops.

So yes, this is a confession that I do have illegimately acquired songs on my computer, but also that I'm actually admitting to it and that I'm buying them as well.
I too have some pre-iTunes tracks that might not be as legal as one might wish... Smiley

But in my defence back when Napster was popular everyone was doing it and I couldn't afford £12.99 ($22~ USD) for one single track I liked.

I use iTunes because:

- Convenient (No hunting, "instant" downloads)
- Cheap [enough]
- Sound Quality [is better than MP3]
- Legal (^Shrug^)
page 1 of 1
Comments: 10 | Views: 1663
Microsoft Communities