Posted By: David7738 | Mar 17th, 2006 @ 7:28 AM
page 1 of 1
Comments: 3 | Views: 6072
First I'll get a rant off my chest: Why are web forums so archaic when compared to a good old Bulletin Board Systems Software?

On my Pcboard Bulletin Board systems we had forums, private areas, gaming areas, etc.

My rant is about returning to a site where you left off and the site knowing about which areas you are interested in, unread messages, and so forth.

For instance when I logon to the site I have no idea of which of the areas have new messages or threaded messages.

The normal answer is that web sites are asynchronous objects while a bulletin board was synchronous.

Similarities: logon (so the user can configure username and the site can save users information.  Members can be configured to get special area access while non-members cannot.

host machine (server) maintains records of users selected areas and last read messages pointer.

Major differences: bbs: 1 -1 software/user ratio webserver: 1 to many.

Could not this 1 to many ratio not be offset by using a cookie on the clients macihne and the server recieving this clients token querying its database and retrieving the last read message pointers this way when one logs into a site and is presented with the index.htm the user could be presented with a list of subscribed areas and a notification of the # of new messages/threads in that area?

As it stands today when I log into a website running a forum software I have to try and remember where I was the last time I had logged in.  I can't selectively ignore a specific user.. Say for instance, W3BBO (just using you as an example, no slight intended or implied) and I have a beef or IMHO he's an idiot and I want to just ignore that user (both online prescense and messages or threads started by that user)  with the bbs software this was included, web based it is not usually a function provided.

Biggest difference was BBS software was text based and the user was generally led through a series of configureable by sysop menu system where web based the option exists for the user to jump around and bypass menus by manually going to a specific url.

Are we held up because of a scaling issue here?  My BBS was limited to the # of phone lines and modems I could afford and I maxed out to approx 150 users at a time could be logged in. Each node only needed roughly the speed of a 8mhz PC XT to run the bbs software and handle the client requests but the database machine had to be a lot beefier and have FAST hard drives.  If I wanted I could run many virtual clients on my 386/486 machines using desqview (pre Windows era).

Today with much faster machines, connectivity, and other advances in technology I'm finding that as a user we are in the Vic20 dark ages of forum software.


PaoloM
PaoloM
Hypermediocrity
There are many forum packages that do exactly what you described, just not this one (in this specific configuration).
PaoloM
PaoloM
Hypermediocrity
Groupee (used on Ars Technica's OpenForum) has private messaging, user ignore, different icons for new updated threads, etc.

It's a Java app with an Oracle backend, tho.

Edit: I suspect that Community Server 2.0 has these features too.
page 1 of 1
Comments: 3 | Views: 6072
Microsoft Communities