Channel9 Visitors Stats | The Coffeehouse

ali_raza_shaikh

Hello

i read somewhere that Channel9 has crossed 3 million unique visitors Smiley

, Great work guys. Is there any website where we can see the stats about the visitors like the Top Ten visiting countries etc etc...

W3bbo
The Master of Baiters

It's probably a LOT more than 3 million. I've got a website that passed it's million-visitor mark a few months ago, and I'll bet no-one's heard of it and it's been around a year. Contrast with C9 which has a much higher pagerank, alexa rank, and has been around nearly 2 years.

scobleizer
I'm the video guy

We just passed 3.5 million unique visitors last month. It's just amazing when you think about what that many people looks like. Thanks for coming!

Wil
Wil

scobleizer wrote:
We just passed 3.5 million unique visitors last month. It's just amazing when you think about what that many people looks like.

Actually, I don't want to think what 3.5 million geeks look like. Sad

Not an image for the faint of heart (or weak of stomach...)

Zeo
Channel 9 :)

So if Channel9 gets 3.5 million unique vistors a month...I have to wonder how many get to see my first posts and comments on the videos...millions prehaps......[6]

Channel 9 is still pretty amazing!

Andrei P
Geekpedia.com

If Channel9 was a commercial website (as in one running ads), it would make almost $20,000 / month.

Charles
Welcome Change

The determination of Uniqueness probably varies, W3bbo...

March 2006 was our busiest month to date!

Thanks for visiting Channel 9!

Keep on posting, watching and listening,
C

Zeo
Channel 9 :)

Charles...thanks for continuing to post on the forums...I remember last month people argued that Channel9 was dead and your ongoing invovlement in the forums makes that argument bunk. Channel9 isn't going away anytime soon.

Cybermagellan
Live for nothing, or die for everything

Andrei P. wrote:
If Channel9 was a commercial website (as in one running ads), it would make almost $20,000 / month.

Wow, that's a ton of Google Ads....:O

Cybermagellan
Live for nothing, or die for everything

Zeo wrote:
Charles...thanks for continuing to post on the forums...I remember last month people argued that Channel9 was dead and your ongoing invovlement in the forums makes that argument bunk. Channel9 isn't going away anytime soon.

That's how you get to be MVP? Sheesh!

W3bbo
The Master of Baiters

Charles wrote:
The determination of Uniqueness probably varies, W3bbo...

Okay, it was an overstatement, I'm counting pageviews Smiley

But since the site has only... about 4 pages the total "unique visitors" count can't be any less than 250,000 already.

W3bbo
The Master of Baiters

Cybermagellan wrote:
Andrei P. wrote:If Channel9 was a commercial website (as in one running ads), it would make almost $20,000 / month.

Wow, that's a ton of Google Ads....

Wouldn't work in our case, a lot of us run Firefox (probably with AdBlock) so we wouldn't see the adverts, the rest of us don't really click on adverts unless they're genuinely interesting.

...GoogleAds on Channel9 /might/ work if they were hawking developer tools and components and whatnot.

ali_raza_shaikh

So, from where we can see the stats.....
it would be nice to know which country most visits Channel9 (other than US), or are these stats private for internal usage

Andrei P
Geekpedia.com

My bet is on UK.

Charles
Welcome Change

W3bbo wrote:

Charles wrote: The determination of Uniqueness probably varies, W3bbo...

Okay, it was an overstatement, I'm counting pageviews But since the site has only... about 4 pages the total "unique visitors" count can't be any less than 250,000 already.

That's not a good assumption, W3bbo. A Unique Visit is IP, session and time-based. A Page View is simply a request for a page, regardless of the three paramaters used above to measure Visits. You should really figure out Visits by doing analysis on your IIS log files (assuming you are running IIS...) using Log Parser. Or, buy some software that will analyze your logs for you from a graphical interface.

C

Maurits
AKA Matthew van Eerde

AWStats is a good free analyzer.

CannotResolveSymbol
{insert caption here}

Google Analytics is wonderful if you can get hold of it-- unfortunately, it won't work retroactively and analyse traffic from your log files.

Rowan
Look, no errors.

So what's the ratio between Firefox users and IE users? I reckon it's about 1:3, respectively.

ScanIAm
On a scale of 1 to 10, people are stupid.

Rowan wrote:
So what's the ratio between Firefox users and IE users? I reckon it's about 1:3, respectively.

Goodness, that's relevant.

rjdohnert
You will never know success until you know failure

Hey guys, what was the most viewed section of C9? Besides the front page I mean.

Cybermagellan
Live for nothing, or die for everything

ali_raza_shaikh wrote:
So, from where we can see the stats.....
it would be nice to know which country most visits Channel9 (other than US), or are these stats private for internal usage

Why is it important? Just post Signal>Noise content and you SHOULD enjoy your stay here...

Rowan
Look, no errors.

ScanIAm wrote:
Rowan wrote:So what's the ratio between Firefox users and IE users? I reckon it's about 1:3, respectively.

Goodness, that's relevant.

No it isn't. Tongue Out

It's just so I can say ~% of the users of MS sites use Firefox. Wink

Of course, you might have to replace "users" with "trolls".

CannotResolveSymbol
{insert caption here}

Rowan wrote:
ScanIAm wrote: Rowan wrote:So what's the ratio between Firefox users and IE users? I reckon it's about 1:3, respectively.

Goodness, that's relevant.

No it isn't.

It's just so I can say ~% of the users of MS sites use Firefox. Of course, you might have to replace "users" with "trolls".

Charles actually showed us the browser share back in March 2005:

He also showed the operating system breakdown, it's available in this thread.

ali_raza_shaikh

Thanks CannotResolveSymbol

ScanIAm
On a scale of 1 to 10, people are stupid.

Rowan wrote:

ScanIAm wrote:

Rowan wrote: So what's the ratio between Firefox users and IE users? I reckon it's about 1:3, respectively.

Goodness, that's relevant.

No it isn't.

It's just so I can say ~% of the users of MS sites use Firefox. Of course, you might have to replace "users" with "trolls".

I stand corrected Smiley