Niall wrote:
Hi,
Like with any transition of o/s versions - I think I will have to be using both for some time because my clients will probably still want XP/2003 support for quite a while (and can't see any big Vista migrations in the short term at corporate level). But *maybe* Vista will be the primary machine for 'me' as soon as its reasonably stable (and we are still a little way from that) and as soon I can cleanly build .NET v2 and v3 apps that can run on all platforms.
In my opinion - Vista is looking very very nice (and cant wait to move to it) - so hopefully it will be stable/usable without the wait for Service Packs...
And as with the previous consumer o/s transitions - ie WinME -> WinXP - there will always be a bunch of critics/companies saying 'Dont use this new Win ### because.... #insert FUD theory#....'. But if you went and searched for all the guys that said this last time around - I doubt you would find anyone still running WinME...
Keep in mind that the companies/individuals who normally spread this FUD stuff - stand to profit from the fear generated - whether it be a company offering security products (ie. XXX isn't secure enough - but gues what - our product will 'fix' this) - or journalists who want to get famous by getting quoted/read.
Niall
I knew Symantec as a security service company would like to find the bugs of Vista which has intergred with security services, but I don't think they will report it without proof, because I think the law still works, at least works at US, that's why I was quoted it in my post.
Service Packs would be a new style of Microsoft products after they releases VS2003 which is a huge service pack that requires you pay for it.
After read above posts, I think people has tons of reasons to using Vista, but they just need one reason that don't using Vista.