prog_dotnet wrote:
1. You cant use Zune as an external hard drive
2. You cant subscribe or download podcasts at the zune store
3. Stripped down device, no games, alarm clock, stopwatch, world clock, password-protected volume limiter, equalizer, calendar, address book or notes module.
4. Miss out on the 3,000 iPod accessories
5. Over 80 percent of 2007 cars will have an iPod connector option, none have zune
6 . regid copy protection and drm. I dont mind paying for music, but it has to be flexible. Like half play of a song counts as "one play", not resend a song.
7 . wi-fi mess, Zunes can connect only to each other. Who’d build a Wi-Fi device that can’t connect to a wireless network — to sync with your PC, for example? Nor to an Internet hot spot, to download music directly?
8. the zune store doesn’t sell TV shows, movies or audio books
9. the zune store are much smaller than itunes, 2 mill vs 3-5 mill
10. the Zune store is also missing gift certificates, allowances, user-submitted playlists and so on
11. can’t use Windows Media Player to load the Zune with music ?? ( this must be wrong )
12. thicker (0.6 inch vs. 0.4), taller (4.4 inches vs. 4.1) and heavier (5.6 ounces vs. 4.8) (zune vs 30 gb ipod)
13. fm radio has week reception and you cant make recordings.
Points 1, 3, 7, 11 and maybe 13 can be handled via firmware updates from Microsoft, which is my understanding they are planning to do. According to Gizmodo (I'm too lazy to find the specific link) they puposly "front-loaded" the hardware so that as they want to add new features all the have to do is update the software, the hardware is already set to go.
Points 2, 4, 5, 8, 9 and 10 are just silly considering it's a version one of a highly upgradeable product, and the iPod faced these same challenges when it came out.
Point 6 is something that can be addressed through software updates if it become an issue that stunts the Zune's growth.
And point 12 is kind of splitting hairs. I use my nano for running, and it's great. Yeah, a Zune is bigger, but I can't imagine it would make a huge difference when I run, let alone something less active.
My big knock agains the Zune, and it may come out in another version of it, is no flash memory. Again, I use my nano for running, so the flash memory is critical to avoid skips.
prog_dotnet wrote:
Competition is good and all. But what, exactly, is the point of the Zune? It seems like an awful lot of duplication — in a bigger, heavier form with fewer features — just to indulge Microsoft’s “we want some o’ that” envy. Wireless sharing is the one big new idea — and if the public seems to respond, Apple could always add that to the iPod."
What is the point of any competing product? To get some market share. And frankly, new competition breathes life into an otherwise stale market. As much as I love my nano, I do find some of the new Zune features attractive, and yeah, Apple can adopt them. But if there were no Zune, would they? Let's face it, pre-Zune there hasn't been much new and exciting in iPod land, save video and new colors. And until I see something offical from Apple, I don't count the iPhone. So, I think this is good for both companies.
prog_dotnet wrote:
So the question is..why should anyone buy a zune player ??
If the features offered by Zune that are not available on an iPod are important to someone, they should buy a Zune. It all comes down to the consumer and where they see value.
And don't take everythign you read in the NYT as gospel, they have their axes to grind just like everyone else...