Posted By: reinux | Mar 20th, 2007 @ 2:27 PM
page 1 of 1
Comments: 16 | Views: 13028

I'm starting to like it more than Visual Studio. It's faster starting, the editor is more tweakable in certain ways, and it seems to do nearly everything Visual Studio does in C# that I ever need it for.

Of course sometimes I need things like Crystal Reports and MSI, but I'm mainly using C# Express now.

Weird, wasn't .NET some evil conspiracy to sell more copies of Visual Studio?

reinux wrote:


I'm starting to like it more than Visual Studio. It's faster starting, the editor is more tweakable in certain ways, and it seems to do nearly everything Visual Studio does in C# that I ever need it for.

Of course sometimes I need things like Crystal Reports and MSI, but I'm mainly using C# Express now.

Weird, wasn't .NET some evil conspiracy to sell more copies of Visual Studio?



I fricken' LOVE Visual C# Express. It's really the main IDE I use now at home. Of course, it doesn't help that XNA GSE is only supported on C# Express right now.

There definitely are some things I miss from Visual Studio though, like Resharper support, Class Diagramming, setting watches for breakpoints, Subversion integration (via a 3rd party plug in that doesn't support Express SKUs), etc. However, C# Express is a very capable IDE, and all free of charge Smiley.

In the grand scheme of things, I believe Visual Studio has some "growth" to go through as Eclipse is quickly catching up (although some would argue that Eclipse has surpassed Visual Studio).

To me, Team System just feels to "bloated" for me.
reinux wrote:


I'm starting to like it more than Visual Studio. It's faster starting, the editor is more tweakable in certain ways, and it seems to do nearly everything Visual Studio does in C# that I ever need it for.

Seeming as C# Express is a strict subset of Visual Studio 2005, in what ways is it more tweakable?

Faster starting I can understand, but VS05 loads in under 3 seconds (but 13 seconds from a cold start) on my machine.


I'm using it at home too, and it's almost all I really need. The only thing I really, really miss is attaching the debugger to a process. I used to think that this was a feature you didn't need in a 'home/student' edition of Visual Studio, until I started creating gadgets and needed to debug the javascript.
 
It's impossible to do that in VS Express, and buying a full version of VS just for gadgets? Erm, no. Maybe this could be an Orcas Express feature? Tongue Out

Edit: Hmm, forgot about the class diagrams. I sort of miss having those, too, but they're not absolutely essential.
JasonOlson wrote:

I fricken' LOVE Visual C# Express. It's really the main IDE I use now at home.


I have to agree. I have beta tested other versions, but the fact that Visual C# Express is free just makes it so accessible. I am very thankful that Microsoft made it free as without it I would have to pay a fairly large amount of money for something which is just a small hobby of mine.

Angus Higgins
That's absolutely true. Hmm, now I really miss the diagrams. Tongue Out
reinux wrote:
Then again, you can always fire up Visual Studio whenever you want a diagram, since they both use the same project file format.


...if I could afford that at home. Tongue Out

Not being able to create Web Application Projects in Visual Web Developer Express is a huge minus when comparing it to Visual Studio 2005.

Not being able to create data sources from non-Express SQL Server editions is a minus when comparing C# or VB.NET Express to Visual Studio 2005.  You can work around it by duplicating your schema in an Express database with something like the SQL Server Database Publishing Wizard on Codeplex and then changing the connection string in your App.config so it is not a huge disadvantage.

What really hurts (and I probably sound like a broken record) is that they won't be releasing Express Editions of Orcas when it ships, not even for the nominal fee they originally intended to charge for the 2005 Express Editions.

JChung2006 wrote:

What really hurts (and I probably sound like a broken record) is that they won't be releasing Express Editions of Orcas when it ships, not even for the nominal fee they originally intended to charge for the 2005 Express Editions.


You've said this several times, but you can't provide a source, beyond rumor and speculation!!

However, there are several references to Orcas Express editions in the Orcas CTP release notes, and just doing a quick Google search, I find that Scott Guthrie has explicitly said that there will be Express Editions of Orcas [Link].

Not to say that I don't believe you, but... okay, I don't believe you.  [6]
JChung2006 wrote:


What really hurts (and I probably sound like a broken record) is that they won't be releasing Express Editions of Orcas when it ships, not even for the nominal fee they originally intended to charge for the 2005 Express Editions.



As my team owns Visual Studio Express, this is flat out false. Hell, Doug on my team even has comps of what the site will look like for downloading pre-RTM versions.

Can you please tell me where you heard we weren't going to release Orcas Express so I can go squash rumors?

Thanks,
-Dan Fernandez
Lead Product Manager
Non-Professional Tools
Dan wrote:

JChung2006 wrote: 

What really hurts (and I probably sound like a broken record) is that they won't be releasing Express Editions of Orcas when it ships, not even for the nominal fee they originally intended to charge for the 2005 Express Editions.



As my team owns Visual Studio Express, this is flat out false. Hell, Doug on my team even has comps of what the site will look like for downloading pre-RTM versions.

Can you please tell me where you heard we weren't going to release Orcas Express so I can go squash rumors?

Thanks,
-Dan Fernandez
Lead Product Manager
Non-Professional Tools


And this is what makes Channel 9 worthwile. Answers on specific questions and rumors straight from the source.
page 1 of 1
Comments: 16 | Views: 13028