http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/Dev/App_Themes/C9/images/feedimage.pnghttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/256637-Some-have-it-worse/Some have it worse.http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/256637-Some-have-it-worse/en-usMon, 30 Jul 2007 11:02:37 GMTMon, 30 Jul 2007 11:02:37 GMTEvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)<BLOCKQUOTE><div>W3bbo wrote:</div><div>Amusing, but those could be self-loweing bollards; we get those a lot nowaday.<br></div></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>He He, they're great.<br><br><a href="http://video.google.co.uk/videosearch?q=bollards">Link</a><br><br><a href="http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/video/view_broadband/519.html"> Here's the original link, but I think it's dead :(</a>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/256637-Some-have-it-worse/?CommentID=330116Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:02:37 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/256637-Some-have-it-worse/?CommentID=3301160http://channel9.msdn.com/330116/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0W3bbo wrote:Amusing, but those could be self-loweing bollards; we get those a lot nowaday.He He, they're great.Link Here's the original link, but I think it's dead :(GoddersUK0http://channel9.msdn.com/330116/Trackback.aspx<BLOCKQUOTE><div>W3bbo wrote:</div><div>Amusing, but those could be self-loweing bollards; we get those a lot nowaday.<BR></div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>It looks to me like there's just barely enough space to get the van through the bollards at the bottom of the picture...&nbsp; probably took a few tries, but it looks almost doable going by the picture.http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/256637-Some-have-it-worse/?CommentID=330046Mon, 30 Jul 2007 02:35:54 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/256637-Some-have-it-worse/?CommentID=3300460http://channel9.msdn.com/330046/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0W3bbo wrote:Amusing, but those could be self-loweing bollards; we get those a lot nowaday.It looks to me like there's just barely enough space to get the van through the bollards at the bottom of the picture...&nbsp; probably took a few tries, but it looks almost doable going by the picture.JonathonW0http://channel9.msdn.com/330046/Trackback.aspx<BLOCKQUOTE><div>W3bbo wrote:</div><div>Amusing, but those could be self-loweing bollards; we get those a lot nowaday.<BR></div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR><BR>Now THERE's a new vocabulary word: Bollards!!!http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/256637-Some-have-it-worse/?CommentID=330040Mon, 30 Jul 2007 01:50:39 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/256637-Some-have-it-worse/?CommentID=3300400http://channel9.msdn.com/330040/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0W3bbo wrote:Amusing, but those could be self-loweing bollards; we get those a lot nowaday.Now THERE's a new vocabulary word: Bollards!!!troposphere0http://channel9.msdn.com/330040/Trackback.aspxAmusing, but those could be self-loweing bollards; we get those a lot nowaday.<br>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/256637-Some-have-it-worse/?CommentID=329971Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:50:22 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/256637-Some-have-it-worse/?CommentID=3299710http://channel9.msdn.com/329971/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Amusing, but those could be self-loweing bollards; we get those a lot nowaday.W3bbo0http://channel9.msdn.com/329971/Trackback.aspx