Interviewing programmers

Posted By: pathfinder | Aug 21st, 2007 @ 9:15 AM
page 4 of 4
Comments: 79 | Views: 13070
#Aug 23rd, 2007 @ 6:30 AM
blowdart
blowdart
Peek-a-boo
Oh yea one funny thing this week. The guy I was interviewing recognised the questions I'd taken from Scott Hanselman's interview questions blog posts.

Yes he stumbled on some of them (why can't people explain the difference between a thread and a process?) but the fact that he recognised the source was a big bonus point in his direction.
#Aug 23rd, 2007 @ 6:37 AM
Dr Herbie
Dr Herbie
Horses for courses
blowdart wrote:
Oh yea one funny thing this week. The guy I was interviewing recognised the questions I'd taken from Scott Hanselman's interview questions blog posts.

Yes he stumbled on some of them (why can't people explain the difference between a thread and a process?) but the fact that he recognised the source was a big bonus point in his direction.


Assuming he would want to work for someone who blatantly plagarises other peoples interview questions Wink

Herbie
#Aug 23rd, 2007 @ 6:49 AM
Sven Groot
Sven Groot
My name has 9 letters. Coincidence? I think not...
blowdart wrote:
why can't people explain the difference between a thread and a process?

Maybe they come from a Unix background? Smiley
#Aug 23rd, 2007 @ 3:06 PM
Wil
Wil
Wil
"Under what circumstances would you, or would you not, use (A) static polymorphism, (B) dynamic polymorphism, and (C) the Barton-Nackman trick?"  Then, "How many different ways is the keyword 'static' overloaded - and why???" Wink
#Aug 23rd, 2007 @ 3:08 PM
blowdart
blowdart
Peek-a-boo
Wil wrote:
"Under what circumstances would you, or would you not, use (A) static polymorphism, (B) dynamic polymorphism, and (C) the Barton-Nackman trick?"  Then, "How many different ways is the keyword 'static' overloaded - and why???"


And why are you talking about C++ in .net interview situation? Tongue Out
page 4 of 4
Comments: 79 | Views: 13070
Microsoft Communities