littleguru wrote:
 | CyberGeek wrote:At 230 posts (including this one) I'm not exactly a frequent poster. Or something. |
you can have 20,000 posts of bs or 200 very good one. What is better?

Let's make a quick comparison:
There's Mike Dimmick with few posts, but they're all +5 and make us want his babies.
Then there's my posts, loads of 'em, but mostly cynical bashings of whatever anyone else is posting.
But 3 years down the time and how many people know me than they know Mike?
It proves that fame is not necessarily a function of your intrinstic qualities, but how much you spam. Previous examples include Britney Spears, System of a Down, and Paris Hilton.