brian.shapiro wrote:
To argue that what Microsoft did was wrong, you have to argue that its bad that browsers are now part of the OS (Windows, Mac, Linux distros), and its bad that browsers are now free.
That I'm fine with, but I felt Microsoft was a little too brutal with the marketing of IE4. I mean, Windows 95 (the 1996 release at least) came with IE2.0 installed by default anyway and no-one complained then.
brian.shapiro wrote:
Aside from that, the time Netscape started actually losing marketshare was when its browser was getting bloated, buggy, and clunky, and IE was getting streamlined and adding features first like CSS and DHTML.
On the contrary. IE3 was bloated, buggly, and clunky. IE4 was a near total rewrite. Nescape intended to rewrite (look up NGLayout) after NS4 but since NS4 didn't get them enough support to do it they spun off Mozilla Foundation and got them to finish NGLayout, XUL, and Firefox in 2004, quite some time. It's no wonder NS folded.