This came up briefly at the IE chat today:
MS Web Embedded Font Technology (WEFT) is a really cool tool that almost no one seems to know about or use. Basically - so long as you have the fonts installed - it creates .eot files of the fonts you used so they are viewable by anyone online - even without
the fonts installed
For a quick example - i used the fonts VGA Rounded and Geometr706 Md BT on my website:
www.jgrant.com/grin
*here is a copy paste - not sure if it will work:
VGA Rounded Geometr 706.
Anyway - you shouldnt need those 2 fonts installed in order to see them.
When i first tried this - i couldnt believe it. How many sites only use arial,verd, tahoma, times, impact,comic sans trebuchet etc only - when in reality the whole web could be a typography heaven.
At the ie meeting i was informed it would be hard to do because of copyright issues surrounding the fonts in question.
What i wanted to re-iterate though was the idea of re-creating the most popular of all typefaces - much like Corel did to Adobe in the TTF / ATM wars. Sure they wernt as "crisp" but they looked the same and were free.
What if - MS paid a team of designers to "clean room" design at least 100 of the most popular fonts - rename them - and make them part of an online DB of fonts that work with IE ( and IE ONLY)
So Futura Bold might = Microsoft Future Bold in DB
( user just uses Futura - IE would determine font matching to MS font)
I think opening up the world of type to the masses - especially with the advent of CSS would not only be noble, but also a killer feature for IE.
In regards to the WEFT tool itself - that should be better integrated with frontpage as well. So instead of opening weft - and answering the wizards complicated questions about "what directories you want to "allow" to have the fonts in - FP could just see what
fonts your using - budle up all the .eot files - and add the requesite <style embed etc> tags into the document.
If it REALLY really is neccesary to know the server for copywrite issues - try to make it easier to specify than it is now.
*FP would know where youre publishing too correct?
Hey Bill Hill (typography guru) what do you think? ![]()
ps - worst case scenario: how about a new Font pack with even 20 new fonts - ideally installed through winupdate
-
-
Maybe WEFT has advanced, but when I was looking into it (couple years ago -- for displaying non-English web pages), it wasn't ready for primetime. It worked, but rendering was slow. When you selected a WEFT rendered text, it was noticeably slow -- and would crash the browser at times.
Turned out, we went back to what worked. Downloading TrueType fonts -- which also a problem, as different font are encoded for different code page. -
i find that everyone has broadband (at least that i know) so its more or less a non-issue
in the old days - Corel ( around the time of Corel 2!) Copeland was determined not be strongarmed by adobe for Postscript fonts - so he just ripped them off - and replicated them.
adobe was fumming mad - but all of a sudden Corel 3 came out with like 500 fonts ( unheard of at that time on PC)
i think the same sort of thing could be done now - in regards to web
"Hey did you hear the new IE supports over 500 dynamic fonts?!"
now dat would B cooool
* plus the more people used them the more theyed end up in cache
Thread Closed
This thread is kinda stale and has been closed but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums,
or Contact Us and let us know.