OK so is Microsoft going to launch Silverlight 2.0 RTM on / by friday or will Microsoft ask masses of clients to download a "Beta" / RC of SIlverlight 2.0 ?
I am Guessing that this week folks are "Heads Down" at MSFT to finish SL 2.0 and can't say anything till the end of the week.
after that we should see VS 2008 SP1 and .Net 3.5 SP1 as finishing SL 2.0 locks down one part of the puzzel.
I hope that "This Week on 9" the show and the actual week end with some news about them....
SL 2.0
VS 08 SP1
.Net 3.5 SP1
no news for some time on any of them, big date for SL on Friday...
-
figuerres
???
-
wisemx
Live it
Notice we haven't heard a word from ScottGu for more than a month now?
I'll bet it's crazy. -
Bas
It finds lightbulbs.
Wait, when was this friday announced as a date for a new release?
-
figuerres
???
actually I heard that his wife had a baby recently. that may be why the Gu has not spoken, at least in part.wisemx said:Notice we haven't heard a word from ScottGu for more than a month now?
I'll bet it's crazy. -
figuerres
???
NBC olympics coverage with Silverlight 2.0 ... been an the books for months now.Bas said:Wait, when was this friday announced as a date for a new release?
and the games start friday. that's why.
http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2008/01/07/2008-olympics-brought-to-you-by-silverlight.aspx
http://www.silverlightexamples.net/post/Silverlight-To-Light-Up-Olympics-2008.aspx
http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/player.html?assetid=f050ea93-ea04-426c-8e50-a94fa23fbbc2&channelcode=sportat
-
Bass
I need better writers.
It looks like NBC is using Silverlight already. But not 2.0. It's optional though, and just for the videos.
-
Maddus Mattus
Do, or do not. There is no try. - Yoda
figuerres said:
NBC olympics coverage with Silverlight 2.0 ... been an the books for months now.Bas said:*snip*
and the games start friday. that's why.
http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2008/01/07/2008-olympics-brought-to-you-by-silverlight.aspx
http://www.silverlightexamples.net/post/Silverlight-To-Light-Up-Olympics-2008.aspx
http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/player.html?assetid=f050ea93-ea04-426c-8e50-a94fa23fbbc2&channelcode=sportat
Maybe they are having trouble implementing the anti smog video filter in SL 2.0?
-
vesuvius
Count Orlock
Silverlight 1 does not have Adaptive Streaming. ScottGu's blog saysBass said:It looks like NBC is using Silverlight already. But not 2.0. It's optional though, and just for the videos.
Now think what this means for end users. This is why the Channel 9 Silverlight Player (and all the rest) are underpants. This is an absolutely necessary feature, and the Olympics would be fertile ground for getting millions of Silverlight 2.0 downloads.
We shall wait and see.
-
figuerres
???
well really I think one of the things they may be working on right now is making sure that the Moonlight kit for mac and Linux and the Windows Kit for Silverlight are all ready and working so that they look good for all 3 platforms.Maddus Mattus said:figuerres said:*snip*Maybe they are having trouble implementing the anti smog video filter in SL 2.0?
at least I hope that's the final thing *IF* the windows 2.0 code is stable and ready to roll.
it's been what 2 months with Beta 2 and no updates, no public RC or B3 and no public info ....
I HOPE they have it ready and are just working like nuts to get it right for the big date. -
figuerres
???
and I'd love to see stats on downloads as the games progress, Mac, Linux and WIndows downloads of Silverlight and of Moonlightvesuvius said:
Silverlight 1 does not have Adaptive Streaming. ScottGu's blog saysBass said:*snip*
Now think what this means for end users. This is why the Channel 9 Silverlight Player (and all the rest) are underpants. This is an absolutely necessary feature, and the Olympics would be fertile ground for getting millions of Silverlight 2.0 downloads.
We shall wait and see.
just to see how it goes. -
Sampy
And I come back to you now - at the turn of the tide
Yeah, no adaptive streaming is lame. Thankfully our CDN has globally distributed servers so it's not as bad as it could be.vesuvius said:
Silverlight 1 does not have Adaptive Streaming. ScottGu's blog saysBass said:*snip*
Now think what this means for end users. This is why the Channel 9 Silverlight Player (and all the rest) are underpants. This is an absolutely necessary feature, and the Olympics would be fertile ground for getting millions of Silverlight 2.0 downloads.
We shall wait and see.
-
How about the Olympic NBC Media thing in 64bit Vista....where is that?Sampy said:
Yeah, no adaptive streaming is lame. Thankfully our CDN has globally distributed servers so it's not as bad as it could be.vesuvius said:*snip*
http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsexperience/archive/2008/07/31/watch-nbc-s-coverage-of-the-beijing-olympics-in-windows-media-center.aspx
-
Have not looked at this recently, but what is the current situation with side-by-side SL 1 and SL 2 installations? A while back I installed SL 2 beta and since then I could never play any SL 1 content. It first wanted me to uninstall SL 2. Really odd since MS did a good job on .Net side-by-side versions, but, at least from my experience, SL side-by-side versions was a no-go.
Ideally the latest SL release should be fully backwards compatible with previous versions (similar to DirectX ).
The reason I ask is because this caused situations where one site wanted me to install SL 1 while another would not work unless I install SL 2. Then when I did uninstall the other version, the one I wanted to install at the time refused to install at all. Just weird stuff like that. I just wonder how many of the "millions and millions" of users that are going to want to watch the Olympics are going to run into similar issues because they might have an incompatible version of SL already installed. -
Was that Beta 1 or Beta 2 that you tried a while back, BitFlipper?BitFlipper said:Have not looked at this recently, but what is the current situation with side-by-side SL 1 and SL 2 installations? A while back I installed SL 2 beta and since then I could never play any SL 1 content. It first wanted me to uninstall SL 2. Really odd since MS did a good job on .Net side-by-side versions, but, at least from my experience, SL side-by-side versions was a no-go.
Ideally the latest SL release should be fully backwards compatible with previous versions (similar to DirectX ).
The reason I ask is because this caused situations where one site wanted me to install SL 1 while another would not work unless I install SL 2. Then when I did uninstall the other version, the one I wanted to install at the time refused to install at all. Just weird stuff like that. I just wonder how many of the "millions and millions" of users that are going to want to watch the Olympics are going to run into similar issues because they might have an incompatible version of SL already installed. -
Bas
It finds lightbulbs.
Realistically, an out-of-the-blue final release within two days doesn't really seem all that likely, huh? Does this mean that the Olympics are a missed opportunity?
-
vesuvius
Count Orlock
Bas said:Realistically, an out-of-the-blue final release within two days doesn't really seem all that likely, huh? Does this mean that the Olympics are a missed opportunity?
More importantly, will the Olympic tech people think they ought to have gone with Adobe Flash? If one is completely honest, the flash player is better than the Silverlight 1.0 at present. Not to say the Silverlight 1.0 won't improve. These aren't the mutterings of Microsoft fanbois, but those of an active developer community, that can see that maybe things have not gone to plan.
Is it Silverlight, SQL Server 2008 or Visual Studio .NET 3.5 SP1 (gosh - that is a mouthful) that's causing the delay? It is the ninth month between Visual Studio 2008 and SQL Server 2008 non-release? Why not just release Silverlight 2.0 as that does not depend on any other platform and will have its own framework?
Maybe they are all late, but that I'm afraid is the price you pay, for putting out quality software.
-
SQL 2008 is no longer on the Server list at MSDN Subscriber downloads. I am pretty sure it was there before.vesuvius said:Bas said:*snip*More importantly, will the Olympic tech people think they ought to have gone with Adobe Flash? If one is completely honest, the flash player is better than the Silverlight 1.0 at present. Not to say the Silverlight 1.0 won't improve. These aren't the mutterings of Microsoft fanbois, but those of an active developer community, that can see that maybe things have not gone to plan.
Is it Silverlight, SQL Server 2008 or Visual Studio .NET 3.5 SP1 (gosh - that is a mouthful) that's causing the delay? It is the ninth month between Visual Studio 2008 and SQL Server 2008 non-release? Why not just release Silverlight 2.0 as that does not depend on any other platform and will have its own framework?
Maybe they are all late, but that I'm afraid is the price you pay, for putting out quality software.
Maybe they are getting ready to release. -
CannotResolveSymbol
Microsoft: Who do you want to execute today?
They NEED a final release before 8/8: The NBC Olympics site uses Silverlight 2 right now (they're distributing Beta 2). If they don't release, they're going to end up with beta software on a very large number of machines, and that would be bad.Bas said:Realistically, an out-of-the-blue final release within two days doesn't really seem all that likely, huh? Does this mean that the Olympics are a missed opportunity?
Thread Closed
This thread is kinda stale and has been closed but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums,
or Contact Us and let us know.