page 1 of 1
Comments: 23 | Views: 1588
figuerres
figuerres
???
OK so is Microsoft going to launch Silverlight 2.0 RTM on / by friday or will Microsoft ask masses of clients to download a "Beta" / RC of SIlverlight 2.0 ?

I am Guessing that this week folks are "Heads Down" at MSFT to finish SL 2.0 and can't say anything till the end of the week.

after that we should see VS 2008 SP1 and  .Net 3.5 SP1 as finishing SL 2.0 locks down one part of the puzzel.

I hope that "This Week on 9" the show and the actual week end with some news about them....

SL 2.0
VS 08 SP1
.Net 3.5 SP1

no news for some time on any of them, big date for SL on Friday...
wisemx
wisemx
Live it
Notice we haven't heard a word from ScottGu for more than a month now? Big Smile
I'll bet it's crazy.
Bas
Bas
It finds lightbulbs.

Wait, when was this friday announced as a date for a new release?

Bass
Bass
www.s​preadfirefox.c​om/5years/
It looks like NBC is using Silverlight already. But not 2.0. It's optional though, and just for the videos.
Maddus Mattus
Maddus Mattus
Do, or do not. There is no try. - Yoda

Maybe they are having trouble implementing the anti smog video filter in SL 2.0?

vesuvius
vesuvius
Das Glasperlenspiel
Silverlight 1 does not have Adaptive Streaming. ScottGu's blog says



Now think what this means for end users. This is why the Channel 9 Silverlight Player (and all the rest) are underpants. This is an absolutely necessary feature, and the Olympics would be fertile ground for getting millions of Silverlight 2.0 downloads.

We shall wait and see.
Sampy
Sampy
This will be the sixth time we have destroyed it and we have become exceedingly efficient at it
Yeah, no adaptive streaming is lame. Thankfully our CDN has globally distributed servers so it's not as bad as it could be.
Have not looked at this recently, but what is the current situation with side-by-side SL 1 and SL 2 installations?  A while back I installed SL 2 beta and since then I could never play any SL 1 content.  It first wanted me to uninstall SL 2.  Really odd since MS did a good job on .Net side-by-side versions, but, at least from my experience, SL side-by-side versions was a no-go.

Ideally the latest SL release should be fully backwards compatible with previous versions (similar to DirectX ).

The reason I ask is because this caused situations where one site wanted me to install SL 1 while another would not work unless I install SL 2.  Then when I did uninstall the other version, the one I wanted to install at the time refused to install at all.  Just weird stuff like that.  I just wonder how many of the "millions and millions" of users that are going to want to watch the Olympics are going to run into similar issues because they might have an incompatible version of SL already installed.
Was that Beta 1 or Beta 2 that you tried a while back, BitFlipper?
Bas
Bas
It finds lightbulbs.
Realistically, an out-of-the-blue final release within two days doesn't really seem all that likely, huh? Does this mean that the Olympics are a missed opportunity?
vesuvius
vesuvius
Das Glasperlenspiel
More importantly, will the Olympic tech people think they ought to have gone with Adobe Flash? If one is completely honest, the flash player is better than the Silverlight 1.0 at present. Not to say the Silverlight 1.0 won't improve. These aren't the mutterings of Microsoft fanbois, but those of an active developer community, that can see that maybe things have not gone to plan.

Is it Silverlight, SQL Server 2008 or Visual Studio .NET 3.5 SP1 (gosh - that is a mouthful) that's causing the delay? It is the ninth month between Visual Studio 2008 and SQL Server 2008 non-release? Why not just release Silverlight 2.0 as that does not depend on any other platform and will have its own framework?

Maybe they are all late, but that I'm afraid is the price you pay, for putting out quality software.
SQL 2008 is no longer on the Server list at MSDN Subscriber downloads. I am pretty sure it was there before.

Maybe they are getting ready to release.
CannotResolveSymbol
CannotResolveSymbol
{insert caption here}
They NEED a final release before 8/8:  The NBC Olympics site uses Silverlight 2 right now (they're distributing Beta 2).  If they don't release, they're going to end up with beta software on a very large number of machines, and that would be bad.
Bas
Bas
It finds lightbulbs.
Yeah, that's what worries me. I haven't even seen an RTM announcement, and there's supposed to be a final release in the next two days?

My worry, however, isn't so much that they're going to end up with beta software everywhere, but that they're just going to miss the Olympics as a great opportunity to promote SL2.
CannotResolveSymbol
CannotResolveSymbol
{insert caption here}
They'll be promoting SL2 regardless...  NBC's not going to switch their online video to flash this late in the game (no pun intended).  I'd think proliferating prerelease software across millions of machines wouldn't exactly be a great move publicity-wise (because, although I haven't had any problems with it, it surely still has some pretty big bad bugs in it that have been fixed in the last few months, and lots of people hitting them would be terrible from a publicity standpoint).
vesuvius
vesuvius
Das Glasperlenspiel
Scoop!


Without Visual Studio 2008 Support?
Visual Studio 2008 SP1 is out to.
They also released a new beta sdk kit for SL2.
page 1 of 1
Comments: 23 | Views: 1588
Microsoft Communities