Yes, you're are spreading FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt). You're claiming something that's not true.
>Microsoft has clearly embraced Digital Rights Management as closely as Time-Warner and Fox.
Because they want to enable users to play the media supplied by Time-Warner and Fox? The logic doesn't follow. If it did, your anger should be just as strongly aimed at Apple, Sony, Pioneer, Panasonic... and the list goes on and on and on. The bad guys here are not the middle men, but the media owners.
> What Microsoft has not done is clearly express what is and what is not supported in its software.
How so?
> And you only find out about what has changed when you try to use capabilities and they don't work. Are they not working because the user interface has changed? Don't know.
More lies. You do know. The OS clearly tells you that the operation would be a violation of DRM.
> Where is the information regarding how to record the sound coming out of your computer speakers?
Very, very few people want to do this. Why would you digitize an analog signal from a source that was digital to begin with? That said, I'm not aware of a single person that wanted to do this that failed to figure out how.
> And I state this in all humility and in deep respect of the many talented people who work at Microsoft.
Somehow, I suspect that's a lie as well.