Posted By: vesuvius | Jan 8th @ 8:00 AM
page 1 of 3
Comments: 58 | Views: 1640
vesuvius
vesuvius
Das Glasperlenspiel
Ever since I can remember, I have used quick launch to access my desktop. Now for no apparent good reason, this has been removed completely. I love the new taskbar, the larger icons and preview features.
 
I just don't understand why this has been removed? I am really quite annoyed about this, as there is no justiication to remove such a simple, traditional command.
Bas
Bas
It finds lightbulbs.

It's still there. Click the transparent bit on the far right of the taskbar.

stevo_
stevo_
Human after all
err what, did you perhaps miss the entire point of the new taskbar being quicklaunch + taskbar all in one.. also show desktop is as bas says, the little button thing next to the clock.
alwaysmc2
alwaysmc2
It's not stupid; It's advanced!
Also windows+d will peek at the desktop.
Bas
Bas
It finds lightbulbs.
Added bonus: you don't have to specifically target the little 'show desktop' shortcut anymore. You can just throw your mouse in the bottom right corner and click, and always hit it. Same as with the start button. There's a fancy name for that, but I forgot it, and I'm sure someone will mention it in a bit.

(Not meant as a reply to alwaysmc2. Why is there still no way to edit this?)
Bas
Bas
It finds lightbulbs.
This really is quite bad. For a start it's on the other side of the screen from the one I am used to.


That's just because you're used to it. No doubt you'll get used to this in no time too.
 
It is poor usability because if you see how far my mouse has to travel each time, yet my taskbar icons are on the other side.


But, you don't have to hunt for it specifically. You can just give your taskbar a swing and always land on that thing. I find that a better alternative than having to actually look for that teeny icon. Your mileage may vary, but with cursor acceletarion, I don't really care how far I have to travel if I can give a quick, small jerk to the right and am guaranteed to land on the right button, while a quick jerk left instantly brings me back to the start button and taskbar icons.
Sven Groot
Sven Groot
My name has 9 letters. Coincidence? I think not...
That's just because you're used to it. No doubt you'll get used to this in no time too.

I don't know. I've been using the button on the left since Windows 95 with the IE4 desktop update. That's almost 13 years of getting used to it being on the left.
stevo_
stevo_
Human after all
I feel for you guys..
foreachdev
foreachdev
Twitter: @foreachdev

The icon was lame. There I said it.

Real programmers used Window+D. The little button on the right is a vast improvement to and Icon on an optional tool bar.

Harlequin
Harlequin
http://twitter.c​om/TrueHarlequin
Problem is, nothing about that says "click me, something is here". It looks like an endcap to me. Even if it was square in shape, and had an icon of a little loderunner-type guy running, that qould have more of a "quicklinks here" feel to it.
Bas
Bas
It finds lightbulbs.
That's almost 13 years of getting used to it being on the left.


I drove a car with a manual transmission for eight years, but got used to an automatic in a day. I dunno. I also never felt a need to switch back to the classic start menu in XP. Maybe I just react to change more easily.
DCMonkey
DCMonkey
Monkey see, monkey do, monkey will destroy you!
So we're actually talking about the Show Dekstop Button being moved and not Quick Launch being removed here right?

Since the new taskbar is bascially one big Quick Launch area, maybe some enterprising programmer will create an app that sends the shell a Show Desktop command so you can put that app first in the new taskbar.

I'm not bothered much by it moving. I have it on my Quick Launch but I usually use Win+D

What worries me is: What happened to the Flip 3D button!?!? OK, maybe not.
Yeah, that's what I love about most criticisms of any new Windows version.  98% of them are simply "I don't like change" rants.  However, without change you can't improve.  Even more illogical is that the response by most of these folks is also usually "I'm going to switch to [OS of your choice]!"  Talk about change!  And it's not like every other OS doesn't do the same thing with their new releases.

In this case, I have to say I'm not even sure why we're retaining the ability to show the desktop.  I pretty much never use this.  The desktop is the worst place to store anything, even in XP.  Of course I realize this is an opinion, and like the famous saying goes, everyone has one of those as well.
CannotResolveSymbol
CannotResolveSymbol
{insert caption here}
Anyone on Win7 want to tell me what happens if you put 

[Shell]
Command=2
IconFile=explorer.exe,3
[Taskbar]
Command=ToggleDesktop

into a text file named "test.scf" (or copy the Show Desktop link from XP/Vista), drag it onto the taskbar, and click it?  Might be the solution you're looking for.

If that doesn't work, writing a little C application to send Explorer the ToggleDesktop command shouldn't be difficult, and you could pin that to the taskbar.
TommyCarlier
TommyCarlier
I want my scalps!
They explain the "why" of certain features very well. They also show some early prototypes and explain why they changed those prototypes into the current implementation.
DCMonkey
DCMonkey
Monkey see, monkey do, monkey will destroy you!
Try putting this in a .vbs file and put that on the taskbar:

set objShell = CreateObject("Shell.Application")
objShell.ToggleDesktop
A reasonable response.  However:

The feature wasn't removed, the "button" was just moved.  Your response to that was simply "I don't like change", while there were important reasons to move it.  Bas had this right, Fitz Law applies here.  Moving it to the corner makes it easier to find the button with a mouse.  If this feature is important, then applying Fitz Law to it is a productivity and usability improvement, and not "change for the sake of change".

Yes, this is likely to annoy some users (some of us adapt well enough to changes like this, that if there's ANY reason for the change, even if it's cosmetic in nature, it doesn't bother us).  Those folks, however, fit in the camp I was talking about, in this case.  There's a reason for the change.  If it annoys you, that's possibly understandable, but not something Microsoft should care about.
Bas
Bas
It finds lightbulbs.
Fitz Law! That was it, thanks. That was driving me crazy. Tongue Out  
LOL.  Well, if you'd said you wanted someone to jog your memory, I'd have replied with that sooner.
DCMonkey
DCMonkey
Monkey see, monkey do, monkey will destroy you!
Or even Fitts's (or Fitts')!

And while on that subject, if the bottom left and right corners are taken by the start menu and show desktop button, the taskbar uses the bottom edge, and the new window arrangement and maximization features use the other 3 edges, will anything be taking advantage of the two top corners?

I suppose the top right is kinda reserved for closing maximized windows, and apps that use the Office-style ribbon would probably want the top left corner when maximized, so maybe it's best to leave them unused by Windows itself.
page 1 of 3
Comments: 58 | Views: 1640
Microsoft Communities