Comment Feed for Could it be that C9 got faster? (Coffeehouse on Channel 9)

Re: Re: Could it be that C9 got faster?

me — Fri, 22 May 2009 01:04:39 GMT

i always complain about speed in toronto - but yes - its faster now.

Re: Could it be that C9 got faster?

Mr. Arkadin — Thu, 21 May 2009 22:08:02 GMT

It's only faster for me when I'm not waiting on Webtrends to load, which most times feels very, very, very, long. Why do you hold up the page loading for that?

Re: Could it be that C9 got faster?

Ray7 — Thu, 21 May 2009 18:37:55 GMT

Yup, I think you're right.

We're back to the speeds we were enjoying two years ago. And the new editor has a kind of retro feel to it, but at least it works

Re: Could it be that C9 got faster?

Harlequin — Thu, 21 May 2009 15:57:16 GMT

The mouse in server 4 was dead and replaced with a stronger, larger hamster.

Re: Re: Re: Could it be that C9 got faster?

Duncan Mackenzie — Wed, 20 May 2009 20:30:50 GMT

Yeah, we are working on that. Seems it is the default behaviour of the editor and we are changing that now.

Re: Re: Could it be that C9 got faster?

stevo_ — Tue, 19 May 2009 23:32:06 GMT

http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Feedback/469766-Just-testing-the-editors-ability-to-make-hyperlinks/?CommentID=469771

*cough*

Re: Could it be that C9 got faster?

Jeff Sandquist — Tue, 19 May 2009 23:26:31 GMT

We have more work to do. :-) See my response in the editor thread at http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/468867-The-New-Channel-9-Editor/?CommentID=469767

Note to self: Found a weird bug as a posted this where we were stripping out channel9.msdn.com from the link upon post.

Re: Re: Could it be that C9 got faster?

Elmer — Tue, 19 May 2009 23:01:41 GMT

I'm still encountering flakiness with posting.

Click on add and sometimes it's quick, and everything works the ways you would expect... other times nothing happens for 30sec or so before the AJAX "loading" overlay is eventually displayed, and then the update is as expected... other times the AJAX overlay is displayed and then there is and interminable delay before the page is actually updated... while occasionally it simply fails – and you may or may-not find that it actually posted. Clearly, there are still issues there to be resolved.

Re: Could it be that C9 got faster?

stevo_ — Tue, 19 May 2009 20:45:40 GMT

Yea I noticed this last week, its hugely faster now.. aparently they reworked the data access and moved to better sql hardware (think it was sql anyway).

Great work guys

(ps, took someone long enough to say something :P)