Computerword reports on the LSE's decision to drop the TradElect system that caused so much embarrassment to Accenture and Microsoft last year. The cost of the writeoff is about £40m – not small change in the current climate.
Steven J. Vaughn-Nicholls gleefully blogs on how this proves that the Microsoft platform aren't suitable for mission critical systems
stevo_
Human after all
"really wa. Sources at the LSE tell me to this day that the problem was with TradElect."
You mean the coffee boys who just assume.. oh new system went up today- and associate that.. regardless if was the new systems fault this guys a cóckend..
More proof this guy knows jack * about anything microsoft: "The TradElect software itself is a custom blend of C# and .NET programs"... mmm yea, I love me them c# and .net programs.. such a rich blend of THE SAME THING.
Bass
I need better writers.
stevo_ said:"really wa. Sources at the LSE tell me to this day that the problem was with TradElect."
You mean the coffee boys who just assume.. oh new system went up today- and associate that.. regardless if was the new systems fault this guys a cóckend..
More proof this guy knows jack * about anything microsoft: "The TradElect software itself is a custom blend of C# and .NET programs"... mmm yea, I love me them c# and .net programs.. such a rich blend of THE SAME THING.
I use C# and .NET to write programs, C# is my language, .NET is the framework it runs under. I fail to see how they are the same thing.
© 2012 Microsoft. Except where designated as licensed by
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License,
Microsoft reserves all rights associated with the materials on this site.
Thread Closed
This thread is kinda stale and has been closed but if you'd like to continue the conversation, please create a new thread in our Forums,
or Contact Us and let us know.