I recommend Ghost. It isn't perfect (and I'm not a huge fan of Symantec) but it works pretty well.
I used Acronis True Image instead for a few years but I got fed up with its bugs which they never seemed to fix. Bugs in a backup tool are not a good sign, really, especially when they affect image validation or encryption and are known about and sat on for months/years with no fix (while the inevitable fixes-and-adds-nothing yearly update still comes out, asking you for money-for-nothing). In theory it's a better tool that Ghost but, IMO, it isn't in reality.
I'd recommend against Paragon DriveBackup too, FWIW. I bought that after the last straw with Acronis and it turned out to be awful. It seems to be able to do a lot but the UI is an inconsistent mess where it's clear that new features have been added by people who didn't know the old UI, and to do certain things you have to start from a completely different place than other closely related things. It's beyond unintuitive, or at least was about a year ago (it could be better now). I swore I'd never go back to Symantec but a friend switched from Acronis to Ghost a few months before and kept saying it worked well so I cut my losses and gave Ghost a try. I've been happy with it ever since.
One thing Ghost is still lacking, though, is the ability to properly filter what is or isn't included in an image backup. Like several other tools, it can only filter when doing file-based backups. (OTOH, its file-based backups actually complete, unlike certain other tools I could mention!)