There's nothing like 'bloat-ware'. Let me quote something:
We've noticed for a long time that there are always some users who love to scream until their vocal cords bleed about "bloat". Typically, they define "bloat" as "Features I don't use". These same users are always in forums requesting tweaks and new features to their pet software. Their sense of entitlement is greatly stroked when such tweaks and features are added.
But when features are added that they DIDN'T ask for, well that's "bloat". The reasons for the changes don't matter. The other users don't matter. The overall health of the project doesn't matter. And it doesn't matter if the screamers can simply ignore the new features and use the software the way they always have, unimpeded. There is no appeasement other than a total acquiescence to the demands of the screamers. "REMOVE IT!" "MAKE A SPECIAL BUILD FOR ME!" "STOP SELLING OUT TO THE MAN!" "LISTEN TO YOUR USERS! (i.e. 'me').
The point that we can't make enough... if you don't like the new interface or the new features - you don't have to use it. Just because you may not choose to use something, it doesn't mean that other users won't. And if new features don't get in your way, then how does it really cause a problem?
Opera had the best standards support in... I don't know... it's been around Y2K, I think, when FireFox, was still called Phoenix or FireBird (not sure) and noone knew about it. Then IE5 for Mac and the famous IE6 with scrollbar color support, DirectX filters, translucency and advanced JavaScript support came along. Every other desktop browser went pretty much downhill. Safari didn't even exist.
In the technology business, strange things happen. Like bringing crowds of Apple fanboys into existence. I still wonder how that one happened.