Posted By: exoteric | Oct 13th @ 5:45 AM
page 2 of 2
Comments: 30 | Views: 1054
Dodo
Dodo
I'm your creativity creator™ :)

Yeah, the thing is just, you have to take into account that you're also using resources to create the storage element, to create the storage technology and to create the pattern itself. The fact that the researchers placed molecules (and thus complex multi-atom structures) onto the storage device (the electrolytic copper plate) means that the storage density has to be calculated by dividing the number of bits by the number of elements used to store that bit. I'm fairy certain this is smaller than 1 bit/atom. If you can just place a single atom on a surface, it doesn't mean you have a storage capacity of 1 bit/atom, because the surface your placing the atoms on is also made of atoms, atoms you forgot to count.

Dodo
Dodo
I'm your creativity creator™ :)

No, the idea is research. Figuring out what we can do by advancing technology. The purpose is therefore purely scientific education. Using equipment the size of a football field to store (and read) data on surfaces as tiny as possible does not provide any advantage over previously existing storage technology. There is also no business perspective about increasing storage density if that also requires to enlarge the I/O device and its power requirement significantly.

Matthew van Eerde
Matthew van Eerde
AKA Maurits

Wake me up when we start talking about kilobit addressing systems.

page 2 of 2
Comments: 30 | Views: 1054
Microsoft Communities