Posted By: jamie | Oct 15th @ 1:41 PM
page 1 of 1
Comments: 20 | Views: 901

http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/14/want-that-early-chrome-os-build-you-got-it/

 

anyone got this?  sorry if its already been posted here...

 

looks weird...

 

 

 

edit: got the ".deb" file ... guess you need debian to try it?

 

 

 

ManipUni
ManipUni
Proving QQ for 5 years!

So chrome OS is just a web-browse that cannot be closed? ...

Were you honestly expecting anything else?

DCMonkey
DCMonkey
Monkey see, monkey do, monkey will destroy you!

Well I was expecting at least a barebones window manager with Chrome being the only app. I would imagine they'll have to at least implement one to frame dialogs and popups.

Isn't that just Chromium for Linux?

CannotResolveSymbol
CannotResolveSymbol
{insert caption here}

This isn't Chrome OS, this is a build of Chromium with the UI it will have in Chrome OS.

 

The full OS will need a window manager, kernel, etc.

Right. Chrome OS is built on top of Linux and has its own NX window manager. So that is essentially Chromium for Linux with a Chrome OS theme.

CannotResolveSymbol
CannotResolveSymbol
{insert caption here}

In other news, a lot of this has been in Chromium's source code for a few weeks now, and it's all available now.  The beauty of open source Smiley

 

http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/browser/chromeos/

Sven Groot
Sven Groot
My name has 9 letters. Coincidence? I think not...

The laws of physics pretty much prohibit increasing clock speeds much further unless something drastically changes in the way processors are made (e.g. photonic computing). CPU makers have been going to multicore not because they like it so much, but because they have nowhere else to go.

Sven Groot
Sven Groot
My name has 9 letters. Coincidence? I think not...

But CPUs are still a lot faster. A Core i7 at 3GHz is a lot quicker than an old P4 at 4GHz. That's due not only to multicore, but also because of reduced CPI (Clocks per Instruction) and several other factors.

Sven Groot
Sven Groot
My name has 9 letters. Coincidence? I think not...

2 of the same thing does not equal more speed on opening corel and photoshop

In this particular example a higher clockrate won't help either. Opening those applications is likely to be I/O bound, not CPU bound. Your PC doesn't seem much faster because your hard disk isn't much faster than what you had with the Pentium Pro.

 

But in other cases you are right that straight speed improvements are easier on the programmer. You don't need to alter an app to take advantage of a higher clock speed (or lower CPI, or increased pipelining, etc.), while you do need to alter it to take advantage of multiple cores, and doing that properly is very very difficult.

 

But like I said, CPU manufacturers are not moving to multicore because they wanted to, but because they had to.

As much hype as manycore and concurrent programming get, sometimes I wonder if faster I/O would reap quicker, cheaper performance gains more easily, whether it be faster hard disks or SSD's, better interconnects for more I/O bandwidth and throughput, etc.

 

Adding more CPU's isn't going to do us much good if we can't flow data into and out of them quickly enough.

It's a good point, but throwing a combination of lots more RAM and the bigger Virtual Address Space of x64 at the problem to allow much more aggressive IO caching can mitigate most of the problems caused by slow hard disks for less effort than making them go faster. SSDs obviously have a lot of promise in that area, but still cost way to much to be practical in common cases.

TommyCarlier
TommyCarlier
I want my scalps!

Jeff Atwood is strongly convinced that the current generation of SSD is fast and cheap enough to be the most cost effective performance increase you can buy.

stevo_
stevo_
Human after all

Yet he bought a non intel ssd, most reviews seem to show that whilst most ssds can bench well at first, its the re-use performance where intel shines and the others crawl down to in some cases slower speeds than classic hdds.

page 1 of 1
Comments: 20 | Views: 901
Microsoft Communities