Posted By: scobleizer | Mar 24th, 2005 @ 5:56 PM
page 1 of 2
Comments: 46 | Views: 28727
scobleizer
scobleizer
I'm the video guy
OK, I just got back from Best Buy. The salesguy there talked me into taking home this new JVC camcorder. The GZ-MC200u.

It's interesting in that it doesn't use tapes.

I have no idea whether it's any good or not. I just got home.

But, I'll report my findings here. I'm opening the box and charging up the battery right now.
Tyler Brown
Tyler Brown
Bullets change governments far surer than votes.
Haha, lucky guy. He must have done a damn good job of talking you into it if you've never heard of it before!
i have firewire now!

not anything that uses it but boy if i ever..... Wink
ps - robert regarding your new thread:
http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2005/03/24.html#a9733

great honesty / great work

sabot (i believe) once said he had me "sussed out as a firestarter" - but that title definately goes to you Smiley

Cheers to your coming promotion or new venture haha
all i know about AJAX - and the post after that about the church switching - is html / dhtml / javascript / asp aint going away anytime soon.

theres just too much stuff out there..

.net and xml and all that is just too complicated ( i admit im far from a programmer) but there must be others like myself who can finally use most of the tech from years ago - and people dont need to download a thing

if i was a programmer - all i would do is scream at ms for charging for the tools to build stuff for THERE platform

i agree with beer here for sure.. dont tax your developers!

* http://news.com.com/Developers+grumble+about+Microsoft+tools+pricing/2100-1007_3-5632488.html

..i mean you can just SEE the suits tinkering with the pricing to wring out the most $ over dev commitment   sheesh..  letem have it robert  & good luck

* sorry this post ended up morphing the ajax post and the church post off roberts site
oops - didnt mean to hijack thread... and now back to HD video..
geekling
geekling
I am an artist
You read it backwards, Beer.

Its

<Comment>
<Author>

not

<Author>
<Comment>
bah beer.. my post makes no sence cause you removed your reply Tongue Out
Minh
Minh
WOOH! WOOH!
jamie wrote:
ps - robert regarding your new thread:
http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2005/03/24.html#a9733

great honesty / great work
Hmmm... First God wanted GW Bush to be president, now He prefers Linux. I'm sure He's not to wild about all those daemons though...
ScanIAm
ScanIAm
On a scale of 1 to 10, people are stupid.
Can it keep Terry alive?

(sorry, I live in florida)
PerfectPhase
PerfectPhase
"This is not war, this is pest control!" - Dalek to Cyberman
Beer28 wrote:
manually reboot it. Stuff like that is fatal. Also I had opened port 53 for DNS on tcp and within a day DNS was down


Did you also open 53 UDP?

STephen
I'm really interested in this one.  according to the specs...

High-Quality MPEG-2 Video Recording (max. 720x480/60i in ULTRA FINE mode) with AC 3 Audio

That's widescreen DVD audio/video quality. Ummmm. Wow!

Post a sample!
Charles
Charles
Welcome Change

No tapes sounds great to me! (and I can't see why the quality would suffer). I hate having to change tapes and then buy more...

C
You need a duel PowerMac G5... Costs just a little more
than your video camera and would allow super fast
encoding to MPEG** and maybe even WMV (If VideoCut
supports it yet)...

I know a guy who does his own video work and has two
of them for encoding and editing...

It is the PowerPC and high speed FSB that make Macs
so lightning fast for this kinda work... You just
can't match up an x86 even if it has a faster CPU.
I wouldn't buy from best buy anyway.. You should buy
online... There is zero pressure so you can get what
you need and not what the person breathing down your
back wants you to...

rhm
rhm
Recording to mpeg2 shouldn't be a problem if you're producing for the web because like, you could record on vhs and it would still be good enough for the web.  Smiley

The problem I used to have with mpeg2 (and more so with 4) is that the editing software had real trouble unpicking the inter-frame compression in a timely manner. OK, this was Premiere 6 which was pretty awful at most things. Maybe now lots of people produce in formats other than DV and MJPEG they fixed it but I haven't used the more recent versions.

While you're shopping Robert, is there any chance of you buying a camcorder lamp of some description for your setup. Even a basic lamp would make a big difference to being able to see peoples faces in differing lighting conditions around the offices. You'll probably need one with an external battery pack for the lengths of videos you shoot.
scobleizer wrote:
And, I'm going to have them DROOLING over Avalon.

(They use plasma screens all over the place to direct people various places -- Avalon would be awesome to use there).


Except they could be drooling over Linux much sooner Wink

I got the impression that it wasn't about the look and feel Robert - not sure Avalon will convert those people who have other issues with Windows, trying to blindside people isn't going to help. 

You have to address the issues that people have .. in this case complexity, cost, reliability, security and community, not convince them that it looks nicer*.  Sure upgrading to the latest and greatest might solve some of his problems - but it'll just increase the cost.  This is the environment where Linux thrives, where there are fewer suits making decisions, where the decisions are being made by the people that have a clue without political interference... I'm ranting and I am OT. I better stop. Smiley


* This works for Apple because it is backed up by ease of use.
page 1 of 2
Comments: 46 | Views: 28727
Microsoft Communities