Posted By: sysrpl | Oct 21st @ 6:50 AM
page 1 of 1
Comments: 8 | Views: 422

Please correct me if I am wrong, but is Windows 7 Microsoft's first OS released which has a lower system requirement than their prior OS release?

CKurt
CKurt
while( ( !succeed=try() ) ) { }

It is not, since it has the same System Requirements as Vista (afaik)

Harlequin
Harlequin
http://twitter.c​om/TrueHarlequin

Looks about the same:

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-vista/get/system-requirements.aspx

http://windows.microsoft.com/systemrequirements

 

I know Windows 7 was touting being able to run good on older machines, but so did Vista. Wasn't Vista supposed to automatically dumb down or something? Did we ever see that?

stevo_
stevo_
Human after all

I think they may well have just gone for a safer 'requirement'.. but the reality is 7 seems to require less to 'get by'.

CKurt
CKurt
while( ( !succeed=try() ) ) { }

It indeed seems to get by with less, but the system requirements are the same. But in al these years since vista the default hardware in a new pc has skyrockted to, the requirements did not luckely.

Matthew van Eerde
Matthew van Eerde
AKA Maurits

Every OS is claimed to be more performant than the previous iteration, but I think Windows 7 actually has some legitimacy to this claim.

I does feel faster by using less RAM. And the boot time is faster with less stages. Vista SP2 probably has similar performance, but, when people think about Vista, it is Vista, not Vista SP2.

Bas
Bas
It finds lightbulbs.

Not really noticing any difference with Vista on my desktop. Media Center player 7 seconds to start. I'll see what happens when I install it on my laptop tomorrow. Of course, it'll be a fresh install, so it'll be fast anyway.

page 1 of 1
Comments: 8 | Views: 422
Microsoft Communities