Posted By: Pace | Nov 3rd @ 8:17 AM
page 1 of 1
Comments: 13 | Views: 457
Pace
Pace
In The Mix...

Been using wave a few days now and it makes forums feel very flat to me. Though at least forums feel a little more organized. But man, I think wave is awesome. I can't give specific reasons as to why, there isn't one thing that's killer imo, its just the product as a whole. Its nothing new conceptually I guess, were just sharing information. But its just a new way of doing something and it does feel improved... to me anyhow... and improvement is good.

 

It feels like a right mess to be honest, some sort of forum engine meets wiki meets facebook meets twitter meets picasa nightmare, but it still somehow manages to feel good (and fun!).

 

Can get a little slow once you have a busy wave and a lot of people are interacting with it (still beta I guess), but I bet once I can invite some devs and do some collaboration, it will come into its own. 

 

Anyone else using it want to share their experiences? 

 

note: if you have an invite and it wont let you invite anyone else for now, Search "with:public" 

blowdart
blowdart
Peek-a-boo

Well, it all seems, well, kind of pointless. The mutant child or IM and Email on steriods, steroid abuse. It's messy, unstructed, difficult to use, and really hard to see the point of, aside from another way for google to gather more information about you to use in marketing.

I haven't used it, but I agree that it seems pointless, for the same reasons as blowdart.

rhm
rhm

I think people who say it's pointless have a disturbing lack of vision. I mean, I'm sure a lot of people were saying email was pointless when they they could only email two or three people. What about when everyone is on it? It sure beats email and IM from what I've seen so far.

 

As for the usual digs at Google (I heard the same when gmail was first around), Wave isn't like using Facebook to communicate with people - it might be a website at the moment, but in the future it's a network of public and private servers + native clients as well as web access. Sure, Google might get info from people that use it's servers, but that's not a reason to avoid the system forever.

 

 

As for my impressions, there are some issues:

 

The user-interface being ugly and slow. It's particularly sluggish on FF and doesn't work at all in IE. I'm sure it runs well on Chrome, but requiring everyone to use a particular browser is the definition of a 'boil the ocean' strategy.

 

Some things I think are ill-concieved such as the fact that everything is editable. Sometimes you want collaborative editing of a document, but a lot of time you just want threaded replies. Editability is something the author of a post should have to enable.

 

At the moment there are some limitations that should be overcome eventually. One is that there's no such thing as public waves that anyone can add to. One idea I had when I first saw the presentation is that it would be a good replacement for blog comments if each post on your blog was a wave and then people would add comments as blips to it. They would then be able to see right in their inbox if any further discussion took place (with the ability to hide the wave if they were no longer interested). That's not possible atm because of the limited permissions model. What if a forum such as Channel9's coffee house was essentially just a collection of waves? Found an interesting thread - instead of emailing a friend a link you can send them the actual wave direct into their inbox. Make a comment in a forum you don't use very often but still want to see when it's updated? Wave could help there too.

 

Overall, I'm still pretty enthusiastic about the possibilities for a federated real-time collaboration protocol, but both the client and the server side still need some work.

exoteric
exoteric
I : Next<I>

I share your sentiment here. It's going to reach beyond just browsers, going into applications, spreading onto homepages, etc. The current view of what Wave is is just one incarnation, it's the idea of a new fabric of communication which is much more broad than current IM, E-mail, forums, blogs, twitters, etc. I'm particularly keen to investigate it's data story: how well does it facilitate embedding data and views of that data and syndicating that. On the other hand, just viewing the current version of Wave as a plain UX encounter one might not really be that excited about it. I think Microsoft is watching this space very very carefully, even if Wave as it is now, in the browser may be a suboptimal experience overall.

Okay, maybe someone can clarify this for me.

 

Is Wave a website run by Google, or can anyone create and host their own Wave server?

TommyCarlier
TommyCarlier
I want my scalps!

And Novell has already jumped on the wave: Novell Pulse.

rhm
rhm

Of course I've used it. Don't be an a-hole.

Okay, it makes a little more sense now. I can see this becoming a real competitor to Sharepoint.

 

For home users it's still nothing more than a fad.

Bass
Bass
www.s​preadfirefox.c​om/5years/

I hope it replaces e-mail. I have some ideas on how to make some money with it.

giovanni
giovanni
...

I also see it as a potential competitor of Sharepoint, some sort of unified communications for everyone. It is probably very well done and everything, but I hardly see it as revolutionary.

page 1 of 1
Comments: 13 | Views: 457
Microsoft Communities