Posted By: jamie | Nov 4th @ 7:39 PM
page 1 of 2
Comments: 26 | Views: 309

youve got .... 10 shortcuts on your desktop...

 

lets say you want to search inside - 3 or 4 of those...

 

why cant you hit cntrl / select / 3 icons - then - right mouse - Search inside (select)

and you get a search box flyout...   "business card" - search = returns results.

 

?

 

i tried creating libraries (lol - what a useless feature - or totally unexplained how to use it one...)

 

maybe even under "Properties" of 3 selected items = new tab - Search within... or something

 

?

Charles
Charles
Welcome Change

why cant you hit cntrl / select / 3 icons - then - right mouse - Search inside (select)

and you get a search box flyout...   "business card" - search = returns results.

 

?

 

Install Visual Studio 2010 Beta 2

Why

CLR4 makes it easier to write managed shell extensions

Why

side-by-side in-process behavior

What

Build a Windows shell extension that does what you want

 

Wouldn't it be nice if you could do this in, say, SmallBasic?

 

C

Charles
Charles
Welcome Change

shortcut librarires

libraries of shortcuts

short

cuts

shortcuts

what is a shortcut

really

deep down inside

 

Smiley
C

Sven Groot
Sven Groot
My name has 9 letters. Coincidence? I think not...

Create a library, add the folders you want to them (not the shortcuts to the folders), and you can search them in one go. Adding a folder to a library automatically adds the folders to the search index (which, if they're on different drives, they currently probably aren't).

Charles
Charles
Welcome Change

black holes and shortcuts

space time bending

pointing in all directions

monad, monad, monad

this time

Sven appears

 

C

 

PaoloM
PaoloM
Hypermediocrity

Sven just told you how to do it. If you don't want to do it, then it's your problem.

blowdart
blowdart
Peek-a-boo

we do not want to learn libraries

 

If you don't want to learn something new then don't upgrade. And don't use we, be accurate, use I. Some people do like libraries (although I can take them or leave them *shrug*)

blowdart
blowdart
Peek-a-boo

I've never had shortcuts on my desktop, so I don't know if you've been able to search them for 15 years.

 

But I do know you can search contents without having to tag anything, tagging is an optional way to narrowing search scope.

blowdart
blowdart
Peek-a-boo

But there's nothing inside a shortcut. That might work on hard links/junctions mind you, but to create those it's command line time

blowdart
blowdart
Peek-a-boo

Because shortcuts can also refer to files. Or URLs. Or drives.

 

Mind you I've always felt shortcuts were daft, NTFS has supported hard and symbolic links for a long long time, so why not use those if you're on an NTFS drive?

99% of shortcuts point to a single file, so searching gets you absolutely nothing over just double clicking the shortcut. That makes the cost of developing and testing such a feature a lot of expense for very little reward. As has been said elsewhere, in the odd case that you happen to want a set of folders to be searchable, just create a library or use a saved search - then you don't even need shortcuts at all.

I must admit that I have zero shortcuts to folders on my desktop. But I do like your "Search inside" option. Folder or file it could still search contents.

But shortcuts came about with Win 95, where there was no NTFS. They're just legacy concepts that we can't easily get rid of. I will say that it would be nice if the graphical shell would start to provide us with the ability to work with junction points of all kinds... though there's many users that wouldn't understand the variations and when to use what, leading to rants like this one from Jaime. Smiley

 

Jaime, you've got a point here. The feature you'd like makes some sense, and shouldn't be overly difficult to implement. However, you're missing the point of all of the other posts here. You're asking for something that doesn't exist in order to solve a problem you have today. There's a solution for the problem you have today, even if it's not in the manner that you'd like. That doesn't make your idea bad, but after suggesting it, it's rather pointless to argue with the folks who are trying to help you solve your problem the way it can be solved today. Who knows, if you embrace the existing solution, you might find yourself less interested in old habits.

 

BTW, you can get very close to what you want today. Create a library for these folders, then put a shortcut to that library on the desktop. Not exactly the same thing, but probably close enough for your built in habit of using the desktop to hold shortcuts.

page 1 of 2
Comments: 26 | Views: 309
Microsoft Communities