http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/Dev/App_Themes/C9/images/feedimage.pnghttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/256098-SQL-Compact-Edition-2005/SQL Compact Edition 2005http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/256098-SQL-Compact-Edition-2005/en-usTue, 10 Jul 2007 04:39:49 GMTTue, 10 Jul 2007 04:39:49 GMTEvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3243.35083, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)<blockquote> <div>JohnAskew wrote:</div> <div>I would doubt it. The footprint is tiny (thankfully).</div> </blockquote> <br /> <br />Footprint doesn't matters.&nbsp; Besides you can have a Jet DB as linked server.&nbsp; And it has a small foot print too.http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/256098-SQL-Compact-Edition-2005/?CommentID=324135Tue, 10 Jul 2007 04:39:49 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/256098-SQL-Compact-Edition-2005/?CommentID=3241350http://channel9.msdn.com/324135/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0 JohnAskew wrote: I would doubt it. The footprint is tiny (thankfully). Footprint doesn't matters.&nbsp; Besides you can have a Jet DB as linked server.&nbsp; And it has a small foot print too.raptor36760http://channel9.msdn.com/324135/Trackback.aspxI would doubt it. The footprint is tiny (thankfully).http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/256098-SQL-Compact-Edition-2005/?CommentID=324047Mon, 09 Jul 2007 19:30:49 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/256098-SQL-Compact-Edition-2005/?CommentID=3240470http://channel9.msdn.com/324047/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0I would doubt it. The footprint is tiny (thankfully).JohnAskew0http://channel9.msdn.com/324047/Trackback.aspx