<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Comment Feed for Newb to SQL Reports 2005, does this call for a matrix? (TechOff on Channel 9)</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/techoff/428984-newb-to-sql-reports-2005-does-this-call-for-a-matrix/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Newb to SQL Reports 2005, does this call for a matrix?</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/428984-Newb-to-SQL-Reports-2005-does-this-call-for-a-matrix/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:48:06 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:48:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3599.6114, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Re: Newb to SQL Reports 2005, does this call for a matrix?</title><description>Are you running the reports with a SQL report server or from ASP.NET?&lt;BR&gt;With SQL Server 2005 the reports can handle anything SQL Server sends them, you just need to drill it down on the report.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;This sort of thing got much easier in SQL Server 2008.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlrsteamblog/archive/2008/08/25/ReportBuilder20-RC1-Release.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlrsteamblog/archive/2008/08/25/ReportBuilder20-RC1-Release.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;btw: &lt;A href="http://www.gotreportviewer.com/"&gt;http://www.gotreportviewer.com/&lt;/A&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/428984-Newb-to-SQL-Reports-2005-does-this-call-for-a-matrix/?CommentID=429028</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:48:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/428984-Newb-to-SQL-Reports-2005-does-this-call-for-a-matrix/?CommentID=429028</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/429028/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Are you running the reports with a SQL report server or from ASP.NET?With SQL Server 2005 the reports can handle anything SQL Server sends them, you just need to drill it down on the report.This sort of thing got much easier in SQL Server&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Mark Wisecarver</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/429028/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Newb to SQL Reports 2005, does this call for a matrix?</title><description>I'm not familar with SQL Reports (our company uses Oracle) but you could do it with subqueries rather than subreports.&amp;nbsp; It might be a bit faster that way.</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/428984-Newb-to-SQL-Reports-2005-does-this-call-for-a-matrix/?CommentID=429023</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:55:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/TechOff/428984-Newb-to-SQL-Reports-2005-does-this-call-for-a-matrix/?CommentID=429023</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/429023/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I'm not familar with SQL Reports (our company uses Oracle) but you could do it with subqueries rather than subreports.&amp;nbsp; It might be a bit faster that way.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/429023/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>