Comment Feed for ExitReality (Coffeehouse on Channel 9)

Re: Re: ExitReality

W3bbo — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 01:37:08 GMT

Re: ExitReality

dentaku — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:53:06 GMT

They might as well make a browser for Second Life and forget about this cheesy stuff.

Re: Re: Re: Re: ExitReality

Adam Kinney — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:52:48 GMT

I don't think the British Library Turning the Pages application would be the same without 3D. That's the first that comes to mind, that's not using 3D just for charts. I'll try and think of others.

Re: Re: Re: Re: ExitReality

magicalclick — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 01:00:07 GMT

I don't see how 3D can improve web browsing. Maybe on IM contact list is fine. The list is too long for 2D approach. The PhotoSync in 3D is cool. I am sure there are many good use of 3D, but not everything.

Re: Re: Re: Re: ExitReality

Erik Porter — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:42:36 GMT

Unknown. You should ask Adam.

Re: Re: Re: ExitReality

W3bbo — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:53:30 GMT

Has there been much effective use of WPFs "3D-centricity" or is it really just a bunch of apps using D3D to make them run faster... and an excuse to write pixelshaders?

Re: Re: ExitReality

Erik Porter — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:22:49 GMT

There are lots of great uses for 3D. This definitely isn't one of them. Yuck!

Re: Re: Re: ExitReality

tfraser — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:10:22 GMT

I think that must have been the case with ExitReality. Either that or it was thought up by a computer-illiterate businessperson who outsourced the development.

Re: Re: ExitReality

W3bbo — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:24:34 GMT

I always had this little theory that things like this are just a cover for an embezzling operation.

Step 1: Nefarious software developer comes up with flashy, yet totally useless concept (thus, almost zero running costs)
Step 2: Developer scores venture capital investment from clueless investors who like what they see, but don't really think too much about it
Step 3.1: Developer embezzles the money into a side account or buying up lots of "necessary" hardware
Step 3.2: Developer spends a pittance of time actually developing the concept into real software
Step 3.3: Project fails and the investors get out, but leaving behind the company's existing assets
Step 3.4: Profit!

Note: No "???" step. :)

Re: ExitReality

Bas — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:44:54 GMT

I was looking at the video and it immediately confirmed what I had imagined: walking a 3D avatar through a 'museum' with Flickr pictures.

I never understood why companies figure that I want that. I didn't understand it with the whole Second Life Shopping thing either. "This is the future: you'll do your online shopping by walking through a 3D isle and grabbing the stuff you want, and walking to the 3D cash register." Why on earth would I want to mimic real stores when I can just go to a web page and instantly bring up exactly what I am looking for, and buy it within five seconds?

Similarly, why would I want to walk a virtual avatar through a virtual museum past one picture by one to look at a guy's photo album, when I can just go to Flickr and see the pictures straight in front of me and click 'next'?

Re: Re: ExitReality

tfraser — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:09:52 GMT

Yeah, I've used it a bit more and it appears to be a painful way of browsing the Internet.

At the moment the two main problems are that it is far too slow (loading a new page takes at least a minute) and it only displays the pages correctly if they have been set up to work with the 3D.

Somehow I don't think IE was designed for this kind of treatment.

Re: ExitReality

W3bbo — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:50:17 GMT

Gimmick.

With the exception of Director Shockwave you never want to see the terms "web" and "3D" together in the same sentance. It invariably means either a glorified tabbed browser or Adobe Atmosphere rip (which is what this seems to be).