<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Comment Feed for Istvan Cseri and Nigel Ellis: SQL Server Data Services Architecture (Charles on Channel 9)</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/charles/istvan-cseri-and-nigel-ellis-sql-server-data-services-architecture/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Istvan Cseri and Nigel Ellis: SQL Server Data Services Architecture</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Istvan-Cseri-and-Nigel-Ellis-SQL-Server-Data-Services-Architecture/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:43:43 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:43:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Re: SQL Server Data Services Architecture, mobility</title><description>&lt;P&gt;From architectural footprint, what about removable medias? Microsoft attempts to extend I/O design of removable media specifications, and a proactive Windows group is supposed to investigate I/O management biased by removable media interfaces going into open industrial standards.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Ideally sales volume and business interfaces of removable media lead conception of lifeline in consumer segment, in which personal and collaboration computing live. SQL Server mobile has scale infinity in a scenario, so what about mobility on removable media? 
&lt;LI&gt;Ironical S+S implementation may supply vary software controls without virtual business development in marketplace, and the software architects of Microsoft should have to come at value added S+S which means SQL Server and Windows differentiation of technical marketing survival. &lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Mobile device may have connected functions for Data Services, what so? Being not innovative part of Data access, but business performer may demand cheap and intelligent device software.&lt;/P&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Istvan-Cseri-and-Nigel-Ellis-SQL-Server-Data-Services-Architecture/?CommentID=338171</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:43:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Istvan-Cseri-and-Nigel-Ellis-SQL-Server-Data-Services-Architecture/?CommentID=338171</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/338171/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>From architectural footprint, what about removable medias? Microsoft attempts to extend I/O design of removable media specifications, and a proactive Windows group is supposed to investigate I/O management biased by removable media interfaces going into open industrial standards.

Ideally sales&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Yoshihiro Masuda</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/338171/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>