http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/Dev/App_Themes/C9/images/feedimage.pnghttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/JAOO-2007-Gilad-Bracha-Computational-Theology-Functional-versus-Imperative-Language-History-and/JAOO 2007: Gilad Bracha - Computational Theology, Functional versus Imperative, Language History andhttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/JAOO-2007-Gilad-Bracha-Computational-Theology-Functional-versus-Imperative-Language-History-and/en-usFri, 19 Oct 2007 18:22:18 GMTFri, 19 Oct 2007 18:22:18 GMTEvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)<BLOCKQUOTE><div>littleguru wrote:</div><div>Nice interview! <IMG src="http://channel9.msdn.com/emoticons/emotion-1.gifborder=0> I wonder what he spoke at his speech, since nobody understood <IMG src="http://channel9.msdn.com/emoticons/emotion-5.gifborder=0></div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>Well, he spoke about the parsing grammar behind his new language, Newspeak. If you don't understand parsers, then your eyes would glaze over. That said, it was a really interesting talk, though hyper-focused on a narrow topic.<BR><BR>Chttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/JAOO-2007-Gilad-Bracha-Computational-Theology-Functional-versus-Imperative-Language-History-and/?CommentID=359710Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:22:18 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/JAOO-2007-Gilad-Bracha-Computational-Theology-Functional-versus-Imperative-Language-History-and/?CommentID=3597100http://channel9.msdn.com/359710/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0littleguru wrote:Nice interview! I wonder what he spoke at his speech, since nobody understood Well, he spoke about the parsing grammar behind his new language, Newspeak. If you don't understand parsers, then your eyes would glaze over. That said, it was a really interesting talk, though hyper-focused on a narrow topic.CCharles0http://channel9.msdn.com/359710/Trackback.aspxNice interview! :) I wonder what he spoke at his speech, since nobody understood ;)http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/JAOO-2007-Gilad-Bracha-Computational-Theology-Functional-versus-Imperative-Language-History-and/?CommentID=359705Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:17:56 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/JAOO-2007-Gilad-Bracha-Computational-Theology-Functional-versus-Imperative-Language-History-and/?CommentID=3597050http://channel9.msdn.com/359705/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Nice interview! :) I wonder what he spoke at his speech, since nobody understood ;)Christian Liensberger0http://channel9.msdn.com/359705/Trackback.aspxFascinating interview.<BR><BR>Please try to get him and Uncle Bob for at least an hour interview in the near future.<BR><BR>Thank you Charles.<BR><BR>[H]<BR><BR>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/JAOO-2007-Gilad-Bracha-Computational-Theology-Functional-versus-Imperative-Language-History-and/?CommentID=359316Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:25:21 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/JAOO-2007-Gilad-Bracha-Computational-Theology-Functional-versus-Imperative-Language-History-and/?CommentID=3593160http://channel9.msdn.com/359316/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Fascinating interview.Please try to get him and Uncle Bob for at least an hour interview in the near future.Thank you Charles.[H]raymond0http://channel9.msdn.com/359316/Trackback.aspxAnother awesome interview.<BR><BR>I had the pleasure to experience the talk this sir did at Jaoo..<BR><BR>And it was mental, i still dont get what he said, but it looked really fun.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/JAOO-2007-Gilad-Bracha-Computational-Theology-Functional-versus-Imperative-Language-History-and/?CommentID=359259Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:19:23 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/JAOO-2007-Gilad-Bracha-Computational-Theology-Functional-versus-Imperative-Language-History-and/?CommentID=3592590http://channel9.msdn.com/359259/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Another awesome interview.I had the pleasure to experience the talk this sir did at Jaoo..And it was mental, i still dont get what he said, but it looked really fun.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Chadk0http://channel9.msdn.com/359259/Trackback.aspx