<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Comment Feed for Making Windows Vista Reliable: Introduction to Windows Reliability with Mario Garzia (Charles on Channel 9)</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/charles/making-windows-vista-reliable-introduction-to-windows-reliability-with-mario-garzia/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Making Windows Vista Reliable: Introduction to Windows Reliability with Mario Garzia</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Making-Windows-Vista-Reliable-Introduction-to-Windows-Reliability-with-Mario-Garzia/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:25:20 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:25:20 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Re: Making Windows Vista Reliable: Introduction to Windows Reliability with Mario Garzia</title><description>Hi Steve,&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;At this point, there's no good ("official and supported") way for 3rd party software to collect this information.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;However, Reliability Analysis Component (RAC), the data provider for Reliability Monitor, does publish an event to the eventlog that contains the stability index for that 24 hour session.&amp;nbsp; The details of the event are as follows:&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;U&gt;Log name&lt;/U&gt;: Microsoft-Windows-Reliability-Analysis-Engine/Operational&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;U&gt;Event ID&lt;/U&gt;: 2005 &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;A full, official&amp;nbsp;solution is being considered for future versions of RAC. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;If you have questions, feel free to email me at valeraz@microsoft.com&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR&gt;-Valera&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Making-Windows-Vista-Reliable-Introduction-to-Windows-Reliability-with-Mario-Garzia/?CommentID=355147</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:25:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Making-Windows-Vista-Reliable-Introduction-to-Windows-Reliability-with-Mario-Garzia/?CommentID=355147</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/355147/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Hi Steve,At this point, there's no good ("official and supported") way for 3rd party software to collect this information.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;However, Reliability Analysis Component (RAC), the data provider for Reliability Monitor, does publish an event to the eventlog that contains the stability index for&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Valera Zakharov</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/355147/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Making Windows Vista Reliable: Introduction to Windows Reliability with Mario Garzia</title><description>I was taking a look at the reliability and performance monitor and I would love to aggregate this data from all of the PCs in my enterprise.&amp;nbsp; Or as a minimum aggregate at least the reliability index information.&amp;nbsp; Does anyone know how to do this,&amp;nbsp; or the name of someone to contact to get more information on how to do this?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Steve</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Making-Windows-Vista-Reliable-Introduction-to-Windows-Reliability-with-Mario-Garzia/?CommentID=354437</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:03:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Making-Windows-Vista-Reliable-Introduction-to-Windows-Reliability-with-Mario-Garzia/?CommentID=354437</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/354437/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I was taking a look at the reliability and performance monitor and I would love to aggregate this data from all of the PCs in my enterprise.&amp;nbsp; Or as a minimum aggregate at least the reliability index information.&amp;nbsp; Does anyone know how to do this,&amp;nbsp; or the name of someone to contact to&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Steve Richards</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/354437/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Making Windows Vista Reliable: Introduction to Windows Reliability with Mario Garzia</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Charles, why are you always defending Microsoft?&amp;nbsp; Let
the developers and PMs defend/sell their product.&amp;nbsp; You end up making
yourself sound like a marketing head, instead of an unbiased technical interviewer.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I believe the viewers want to associate with the interviewer in that we want to
view a balanced dialog as we would have with the interviewee.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I've been watching channel 9 since the very beginning, and I've always sighed
when I've heard you sort of dwell on the selling points of the product rather
than probe the corner cases.&amp;nbsp; I think Scobble did a good job of getting at
those more interesting topics.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Of course, I've seen that you're pretty sensitive about "Scobble did his
thing, and I do my thing", but I think you can still be your own person
and still learn from others.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That's my constructive criticism for today.&lt;br&gt;
Cheers,&lt;br&gt;
Munkie&lt;/p&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Making-Windows-Vista-Reliable-Introduction-to-Windows-Reliability-with-Mario-Garzia/?CommentID=292553</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:37:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Making-Windows-Vista-Reliable-Introduction-to-Windows-Reliability-with-Mario-Garzia/?CommentID=292553</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/292553/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Charles, why are you always defending Microsoft?&amp;nbsp; Let
the developers and PMs defend/sell their product.&amp;nbsp; You end up making
yourself sound like a marketing head, instead of an unbiased technical interviewer.

I believe the viewers want to associate with the interviewer in that we want&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Munkie</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/292553/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Making Windows Vista Reliable: Introduction to Windows Reliability with Mario Garzia</title><description>The problem with the reliability monitor is that its kind of useless if you use your machine for development work.&amp;nbsp; My own programs are crashing, and I'm debugging them, and the more I debug&amp;nbsp;my code&amp;nbsp;the lower my reliability index becomes.&amp;nbsp; Is there anyway to better configure the reliability monitor for a development machine, such as ignoring certain app crashes, etc?</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Making-Windows-Vista-Reliable-Introduction-to-Windows-Reliability-with-Mario-Garzia/?CommentID=292029</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 06:06:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Making-Windows-Vista-Reliable-Introduction-to-Windows-Reliability-with-Mario-Garzia/?CommentID=292029</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/292029/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>The problem with the reliability monitor is that its kind of useless if you use your machine for development work.&amp;nbsp; My own programs are crashing, and I'm debugging them, and the more I debug&amp;nbsp;my code&amp;nbsp;the lower my reliability index becomes.&amp;nbsp; Is there anyway to better configure the&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>DigitalDud</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/292029/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>