http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/Dev/App_Themes/C9/images/feedimage.pnghttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/Michael Wallent: Advent and Evolution of WPFhttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/en-usThu, 27 Apr 2006 05:36:01 GMTThu, 27 Apr 2006 05:36:01 GMTEvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)<P>Sensible questions from Professor Sneath allow Michael Wallent to recover all of the ground he lost with those dodgy "ActiveX is only used for advertising" pronouncements around the time of EOLAS. If this is the face of Microsoft's current strategic management, then good. Thanks too for "A Big Whatever", now an integral part of our company's lexicon.</P>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=181543Thu, 27 Apr 2006 05:36:01 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=1815430http://channel9.msdn.com/181543/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Sensible questions from Professor Sneath allow Michael Wallent to recover all of the ground he lost with those dodgy "ActiveX is only used for advertising" pronouncements around the time of EOLAS. If this is the face of Microsoft's current strategic management, then good. Thanks too for "A Big&#8230;jerry.mead0http://channel9.msdn.com/181543/Trackback.aspxI know that it is very difficult <i>not</i> to sound cynical in this age of the smirk but I am freaking serious when I say that this is the guy I wanted to hear from for years. Years! Anyone who has written HTML by hand at least three times for the last decade needs to see this video!<i><br><br>Nothing</i> replaces an excellent discussion of technology in a historical context like this Channel9 post. Everything else is existential doggy bags and sophomoric kiddie plates served in a vacuum.<br>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=181402Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:30:34 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=1814020http://channel9.msdn.com/181402/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0I know that it is very difficult not to sound cynical in this age of the smirk but I am freaking serious when I say that this is the guy I wanted to hear from for years. Years! Anyone who has written HTML by hand at least three times for the last decade needs to see this video!Nothing replaces an&#8230;rasx0http://channel9.msdn.com/181402/Trackback.aspxI can buy Mike's claim that the team found boxes with Windows 2000 installed couldn't be counted on for video acceleration, but don't buy his argument for some of the other WPF/E platforms--particularly Mac OS X.&nbsp; If he would have claimed resource issues or competitive positioning, I would have believed him.<br>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=181364Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:26:44 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=1813640http://channel9.msdn.com/181364/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0I can buy Mike's claim that the team found boxes with Windows 2000 installed couldn't be counted on for video acceleration, but don't buy his argument for some of the other WPF/E platforms--particularly Mac OS X.&nbsp; If he would have claimed resource issues or competitive positioning, I would have believed him.homli0http://channel9.msdn.com/181364/Trackback.aspxSuper!http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=181289Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:53:38 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=1812890http://channel9.msdn.com/181289/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Super!LightRider0http://channel9.msdn.com/181289/Trackback.aspxGreat video!<BR><BR>Nice to hear the background information, and the history of the path the product walkshttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=181208Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:01:57 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=1812080http://channel9.msdn.com/181208/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Great video!Nice to hear the background information, and the history of the path the product walkserik_0http://channel9.msdn.com/181208/Trackback.aspx<BLOCKQUOTE><div>charles wrote:</div><div>one of the people who helped create DHTML</div></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>So he helped create HTML,CSS <b>and</b> Javascript? Quite an achievement! <img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/emoticons/emotion-1.gifborder="><br>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=181106Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:11:16 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=1811060http://channel9.msdn.com/181106/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0charles wrote:one of the people who helped create DHTMLSo he helped create HTML,CSS and Javascript? Quite an achievement! sloppycode0http://channel9.msdn.com/181106/Trackback.aspx[quote user="sloppycode"<em></em>]one of the people who helped create DHTML[/quote]<br><br>So he helped create HTML,CSS <b>and</b> Javascript? Quite an achievement! :)<br>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=181104Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:08:08 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=1811040http://channel9.msdn.com/181104/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0[quote user="sloppycode"]one of the people who helped create DHTML[/quote]So he helped create HTML,CSS and Javascript? Quite an achievement! :)sloppycode0http://channel9.msdn.com/181104/Trackback.aspxDHTML! wow. I did once a web site that build completely on DHTML. <BR><BR>My approach was very very similar to the current AJAX technology. <BR><BR>But in that time frame no browser (except IE) understood what I wanted him to do :D I still remember all the exception boxes when loading the site in Netscape or Opera. Netscape even crashed.<BR><BR>That was fun.http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=181082Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:28:00 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=1810820http://channel9.msdn.com/181082/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0DHTML! wow. I did once a web site that build completely on DHTML. My approach was very very similar to the current AJAX technology. But in that time frame no browser (except IE) understood what I wanted him to do :D I still remember all the exception boxes when loading the site in Netscape or Opera.&#8230;Christian Liensberger0http://channel9.msdn.com/181082/Trackback.aspxA greaaat interview, super-interesting stuffhttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=181056Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:55:31 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=1810560http://channel9.msdn.com/181056/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0A greaaat interview, super-interesting stuffkostik_y2k0http://channel9.msdn.com/181056/Trackback.aspxThank you Michael, Charles and Tim.&nbsp; Loved it, blogged it, looking forward to the platform even more now.http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=181028Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:51:46 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=1810280http://channel9.msdn.com/181028/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Thank you Michael, Charles and Tim.&nbsp; Loved it, blogged it, looking forward to the platform even more now.Adam Kinney0http://channel9.msdn.com/181028/Trackback.aspxGreat video, but I am still waiting for Sparkle! <BR>It has been a very long wait and I am still waiting.<BR><BR>Suggestions&nbsp;for version release frequency:<BR><BR>Stand-alone-applications (Internet Explorer): Every Year<BR><BR>Tools (Visual Studio, Expression Suite): Every Two Years<BR><BR>Office: Every Three Years<BR><BR>Window Operating Systems and SQL Server: Every Four Years<BR><BR>Five and six year waits&nbsp;are inexcusable.&nbsp;<BR> <BR>Less features-more releases.<BR><BR>Thank you again for a great interview.<BR><BR>Raymond<BR><BR>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=180986Wed, 26 Apr 2006 02:11:41 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=1809860http://channel9.msdn.com/180986/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Great video, but I am still waiting for Sparkle! It has been a very long wait and I am still waiting.Suggestions&nbsp;for version release frequency:Stand-alone-applications (Internet Explorer): Every YearTools (Visual Studio, Expression Suite): Every Two YearsOffice: Every Three YearsWindow&#8230;raymond0http://channel9.msdn.com/180986/Trackback.aspxThe absolute best start to finish explanation of why WPF exists and what it aims to solve I've ever seen/heard.http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=180962Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:11:20 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=1809620http://channel9.msdn.com/180962/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0The absolute best start to finish explanation of why WPF exists and what it aims to solve I've ever seen/heard.dmarsh0http://channel9.msdn.com/180962/Trackback.aspx<P>Good introduction on history and background of WPF. The first half was very good.<BR><BR>For some the confirmation about unmanaged and public MIL API 'to replace GDI' may be news. Obviously the GDI will still be there and the perf of latest CPUs doesn't make one miss the lack of hw-acceleration.</P>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=180915Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:58:17 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=1809150http://channel9.msdn.com/180915/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Good introduction on history and background of WPF. The first half was very good.For some the confirmation about unmanaged and public MIL API 'to replace GDI' may be news. Obviously the GDI will still be there and the perf of latest CPUs doesn't make one miss the lack of hw-acceleration.androidi0http://channel9.msdn.com/180915/Trackback.aspxGreat Background Info.http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=180918Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:12:39 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=1809180http://channel9.msdn.com/180918/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Great Background Info.Zeo0http://channel9.msdn.com/180918/Trackback.aspxGreat stuff...when you going to be back in UK...miss your presentations at the Edinburgh Roadshows... :-)http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=180884Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:03:43 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Michael-Wallent-Advent-and-Evolution-of-WPF/?CommentID=1808840http://channel9.msdn.com/180884/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Great stuff...when you going to be back in UK...miss your presentations at the Edinburgh Roadshows... :-)Iain Rae Lennox0http://channel9.msdn.com/180884/Trackback.aspx