I didn't understand anything except for the bit about the Eskimos. But apparently most Eskimo languages have no more words for snow than English its just that they join two words together to make a single word like coldsnow or wetsnow. So put like that they could make infinite words for snow.
paulcoder wrote: I didn't understand anything except for the bit about the Eskimos. But apparently most Eskimo languages have no more words for snow than English its just that they join two words together to make a single word like coldsnow or wetsnow. So put like that they could make infinite words for snow.
Nice video and an Amber reference too!Been a reader of Ted Neward's blog for a while now, good stuff.http://blogs.tedneward.com/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eskimo_words_for_snowhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine_princes_in_amber
Ted's presenting topics with regarding to today’s computing language is openness of declaration and behavior.
On the one hand ideas of Windows platform development has any .NET languages which accommodate forms, communication and business rules. On the other hand advancing behavior of .NET languages may alter language expressions.As Microsoft Developer Network delivers blueprints to build set of development practices, Architects should probe truly categorized computing topics, which mean to avoid kind of “development practice for development practices”.