http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/Dev/App_Themes/C9/images/feedimage.pnghttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Windows-Vista-Diagnostics-Moving-closer-to-a-self-healing-OS/Windows Vista Diagnostics: Moving closer to a self-healing OShttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Windows-Vista-Diagnostics-Moving-closer-to-a-self-healing-OS/en-usFri, 02 Mar 2007 01:49:00 GMTFri, 02 Mar 2007 01:49:00 GMTEvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)<BLOCKQUOTE><div>DoomBringer wrote:</div><div>I've seen the hard disk failure thing already.&nbsp; It was useful, but the backup process it tried to launch wasn't as slick it could have been.</div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>What would make it better (slicker) in your opinion? The team is listening.....<BR>Chttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Windows-Vista-Diagnostics-Moving-closer-to-a-self-healing-OS/?CommentID=291685Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:49:00 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Windows-Vista-Diagnostics-Moving-closer-to-a-self-healing-OS/?CommentID=2916850http://channel9.msdn.com/291685/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0DoomBringer wrote:I've seen the hard disk failure thing already.&nbsp; It was useful, but the backup process it tried to launch wasn't as slick it could have been.What would make it better (slicker) in your opinion? The team is listening.....CCharles0http://channel9.msdn.com/291685/Trackback.aspxI've seen the hard disk failure thing already.&nbsp; It was useful, but the backup process it tried to launch wasn't as slick it could have been.http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Windows-Vista-Diagnostics-Moving-closer-to-a-self-healing-OS/?CommentID=291652Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:21:27 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Windows-Vista-Diagnostics-Moving-closer-to-a-self-healing-OS/?CommentID=2916520http://channel9.msdn.com/291652/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0I've seen the hard disk failure thing already.&nbsp; It was useful, but the backup process it tried to launch wasn't as slick it could have been.DoomBringer0http://channel9.msdn.com/291652/Trackback.aspxAbout the only time I ever totally nuked my OS was due to a memory error, having a checker would have been incredibly useful then, and will probably be hugely helpful in the future. Good work fellas.<br><br>Now if only I could get my parent's PC to forward on errors to me I could tell them remotely what was likely to be wrong with it. (Plus that'd be useful for sysadmins, but then can ask for it themselves.)<br>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Windows-Vista-Diagnostics-Moving-closer-to-a-self-healing-OS/?CommentID=291207Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:48:08 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Charles/Windows-Vista-Diagnostics-Moving-closer-to-a-self-healing-OS/?CommentID=2912070http://channel9.msdn.com/291207/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0About the only time I ever totally nuked my OS was due to a memory error, having a checker would have been incredibly useful then, and will probably be hugely helpful in the future. Good work fellas.Now if only I could get my parent's PC to forward on errors to me I could tell them remotely what was&#8230;Massif0http://channel9.msdn.com/291207/Trackback.aspx