http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/Dev/App_Themes/C9/images/feedimage.pnghttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/C9-Bytes-Don-and-Chris-explain-Oslo-in-5-minutes/C9 Bytes: Don and Chris explain Oslo in 5 minuteshttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/C9-Bytes-Don-and-Chris-explain-Oslo-in-5-minutes/en-usThu, 30 Oct 2008 04:17:35 GMTThu, 30 Oct 2008 04:17:35 GMTEvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)<P>Tool, Language, Repository..... FoxPro?</P>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/C9-Bytes-Don-and-Chris-explain-Oslo-in-5-minutes/?CommentID=437126Thu, 30 Oct 2008 04:17:35 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/C9-Bytes-Don-and-Chris-explain-Oslo-in-5-minutes/?CommentID=4371260http://channel9.msdn.com/437126/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Tool, Language, Repository..... FoxPro?Dark_Halmut0http://channel9.msdn.com/437126/Trackback.aspxHmm... still not very clear though as to how this whole "model is the app" principle will actually look in practice. I think we need more&nbsp;<STRONG>concrete</STRONG> scenarios. For example, we could try contrasting a service modelled and written with <STRONG>Service Factory</STRONG> (which is the more traditional model + code-gen type approach) vs. the same&nbsp;service&nbsp;built&nbsp;with Oslo (and perhaps Dublin backing that) . That could help give more traction to and a better understanding of Oslo's value.http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/C9-Bytes-Don-and-Chris-explain-Oslo-in-5-minutes/?CommentID=437108Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:45:12 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/C9-Bytes-Don-and-Chris-explain-Oslo-in-5-minutes/?CommentID=4371080http://channel9.msdn.com/437108/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Hmm... still not very clear though as to how this whole "model is the app" principle will actually look in practice. I think we need more&nbsp;concrete scenarios. For example, we could try contrasting a service modelled and written with Service Factory (which is the more traditional model + code-gen&#8230;Santosh Benjamin0http://channel9.msdn.com/437108/Trackback.aspxGreat love the idea!   I believe the direction we are going here versus msil and others.  I like the data driven direction path and improvements with declarative models.     A platform like OSLO has been a long time coming.  Do you think it could reduce dependecy on com objects?<div><br></div>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/C9-Bytes-Don-and-Chris-explain-Oslo-in-5-minutes/?CommentID=436861Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:22:37 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/C9-Bytes-Don-and-Chris-explain-Oslo-in-5-minutes/?CommentID=4368610http://channel9.msdn.com/436861/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Great love the idea!   I believe the direction we are going here versus msil and others.  I like the data driven direction path and improvements with declarative models.     A platform like OSLO has been a long time coming.  Do you think it could reduce dependecy on com objects?Steven A. Sherman0http://channel9.msdn.com/436861/Trackback.aspx