http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/Dev/App_Themes/C9/images/feedimage.pnghttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/Ken-Levy-and-Aaron-Marten-Visual-Studio-2008-Extensibility/Ken Levy and Aaron Marten: Visual Studio 2008 Extensibilityhttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/Ken-Levy-and-Aaron-Marten-Visual-Studio-2008-Extensibility/en-usTue, 13 May 2008 19:23:09 GMTTue, 13 May 2008 19:23:09 GMTEvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)I tried installing the storyboard tool discussed in the video and I got an error on install.<BR><BR>I reviewed the codeplex page and I was glad to see other users were having the same issue.&nbsp; But I was disppointed I didn't find any posts by MSFT people that this is a known bug and we're working on it......http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/Ken-Levy-and-Aaron-Marten-Visual-Studio-2008-Extensibility/?CommentID=403200Tue, 13 May 2008 19:23:09 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/Ken-Levy-and-Aaron-Marten-Visual-Studio-2008-Extensibility/?CommentID=4032000http://channel9.msdn.com/403200/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0I tried installing the storyboard tool discussed in the video and I got an error on install.I reviewed the codeplex page and I was glad to see other users were having the same issue.&nbsp; But I was disppointed I didn't find any posts by MSFT people that this is a known bug and we're working on it......spottedmahn0http://channel9.msdn.com/403200/Trackback.aspxI agree Richard.<br><br>This video is too high res.<br><br><br><br><br>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/Ken-Levy-and-Aaron-Marten-Visual-Studio-2008-Extensibility/?CommentID=392539Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:10:35 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/Ken-Levy-and-Aaron-Marten-Visual-Studio-2008-Extensibility/?CommentID=3925390http://channel9.msdn.com/392539/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0I agree Richard.This video is too high res.malcolms0http://channel9.msdn.com/392539/Trackback.aspx<BLOCKQUOTE><div>Dan wrote:</div><div><blockquote><table><tr><td><img src="http://channel9.msdn.com/Themes/AlmostGlass/images/icon-quote.gif></td><td><strong>RichardRudek wrote:</strong><i>I'm starting to feel like a junk-yard dog...<br><br>It's taking too long to download. Can you guys try to have a little consistency between you. I prefer a lower resolution video. The 320x240 512Kbps is fine for whiteboard stuff (not that I know whether it's in this video or not), and when you zoom in, it's also fine for the videoed 'screencast' stuff too.<br><br>Actually, it would help if you started to rate the content, so we can make informed choices about what to download - ie maybe this one only needs the audio...<br></i></td></tr></table></blockquote><br><br>I can add the low-res version, but I'm not quite sure what you mean by ratings or how ratings would help you choose whether you only need the audio. Can you explain a bit more?</div></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>First off, thanks for the video. Though, I can't help the feeling of [<a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=384734#384734>deja vu</a>]...<br><br>Ratings is probably a bad word to use to describe what I meant. Basically, if the content is just head-shots and talk, then that would be an audio-only recommendation.<br><br>White-board only would be a low res video recommendation.<br><br>Video recorded screencasts, with lazy camera operation (not zooming in close as approriate with the conversation) would be a high res recommendation.<br><br>Now if your really into editing/post production, you could take a portable hard disk with you, and save a proper screencast to it. Obviously, the screencast machine will need to have Window Media Encoder (or a commercial product that does it), but at least you get a full-res, high quality, low bandwidth (separate) recording that you could render into a single video stream, later. Better still, produce a multiple stream source that switches appropriately between the screencast and video streams. The best of both worlds for the end users, though a huge PITA for you guys... [A]<br><br>Thanks for the video&nbsp; :)<br>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/Ken-Levy-and-Aaron-Marten-Visual-Studio-2008-Extensibility/?CommentID=391730Thu, 28 Feb 2008 05:11:51 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/Ken-Levy-and-Aaron-Marten-Visual-Studio-2008-Extensibility/?CommentID=3917300http://channel9.msdn.com/391730/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Dan wrote:RichardRudek wrote:I'm starting to feel like a junk-yard dog...It's taking too long to download. Can you guys try to have a little consistency between you. I prefer a lower resolution video. The 320x240 512Kbps is fine for whiteboard stuff (not that I know whether it's in this video or&#8230;RichardRudek0http://channel9.msdn.com/391730/Trackback.aspx<BLOCKQUOTE><div>RichardRudek wrote:</div><div>I'm starting to feel like a junk-yard dog...<BR><BR>It's taking too long to download. Can you guys try to have a little consistency between you. I prefer a lower resolution video. The 320x240 512Kbps is fine for whiteboard stuff (not that I know whether it's in this video or not), and when you zoom in, it's also fine for the videoed 'screencast' stuff too.<BR><BR>Actually, it would help if you started to rate the content, so we can make informed choices about what to download - ie maybe this one only needs the audio...<BR></div></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>I can add the low-res version, but I'm not quite sure what you mean by ratings or how ratings would help you choose whether you only need the audio. Can you explain a bit more?http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/Ken-Levy-and-Aaron-Marten-Visual-Studio-2008-Extensibility/?CommentID=391715Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:16:48 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/Ken-Levy-and-Aaron-Marten-Visual-Studio-2008-Extensibility/?CommentID=3917150http://channel9.msdn.com/391715/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0RichardRudek wrote:I'm starting to feel like a junk-yard dog...It's taking too long to download. Can you guys try to have a little consistency between you. I prefer a lower resolution video. The 320x240 512Kbps is fine for whiteboard stuff (not that I know whether it's in this video or not), and&#8230;Dan Fernandez0http://channel9.msdn.com/391715/Trackback.aspxI'm starting to feel like a junk-yard dog...<br><br>It's taking too long to download. Can you guys try to have a little consistency between you. I prefer a lower resolution video. The 320x240 512Kbps is fine for whiteboard stuff (not that I know whether it's in this video or not), and when you zoom in, it's also fine for the videoed 'screencast' stuff too.<br><br>Actually, it would help if you started to rate the content, so we can make informed choices about what to download - ie maybe this one only needs the audio...<br>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/Ken-Levy-and-Aaron-Marten-Visual-Studio-2008-Extensibility/?CommentID=391678Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:57:29 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/Ken-Levy-and-Aaron-Marten-Visual-Studio-2008-Extensibility/?CommentID=3916780http://channel9.msdn.com/391678/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0I'm starting to feel like a junk-yard dog...It's taking too long to download. Can you guys try to have a little consistency between you. I prefer a lower resolution video. The 320x240 512Kbps is fine for whiteboard stuff (not that I know whether it's in this video or not), and when you zoom in, it's&#8230;RichardRudek0http://channel9.msdn.com/391678/Trackback.aspxUseful interview, thanks!http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/Ken-Levy-and-Aaron-Marten-Visual-Studio-2008-Extensibility/?CommentID=391548Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:22:56 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/Ken-Levy-and-Aaron-Marten-Visual-Studio-2008-Extensibility/?CommentID=3915480http://channel9.msdn.com/391548/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Useful interview, thanks!Yankee0http://channel9.msdn.com/391548/Trackback.aspx