Comment Feed for Channel 9 - Internet Explorer 9 and Real World performance http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/o9/ch9/2d00/29244b1e-48d4-4b19-b040-9e30011d2d00/IE9perf_100_ch9.jpg Channel 9 - Internet Explorer 9 and Real World performance Jason Weber, Principal Program Manager Lead for Internet Explorer, discusses Microsoft’s point of view on real world browser performance. en Tue, 21 May 2013 04:29:19 GMT Tue, 21 May 2013 04:29:19 GMT Rev9 Re: Internet Explorer 9 and Real World performance posted by markadama

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634256239560000000 Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:52:36 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634256239560000000 markadama Re: Internet Explorer 9 and Real World performance posted by sagiv

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634256613730000000 Thu, 18 Nov 2010 07:16:13 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634256613730000000 sagiv Re: Internet Explorer 9 and Real World performance What about making your own browser test that tests all the 11 subsystems in different combinations? And also, people don't only focus on HTML5 performance, but also the time it takes to load a page, which is extremely important for the consumer.

posted by martinmine

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634258905610000000 Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:56:01 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634258905610000000 martinmine Re: Internet Explorer 9 and Real World performance posted by jjjjj

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634259270680000000 Sun, 21 Nov 2010 09:04:28 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634259270680000000 jjjjj Re: Internet Explorer 9 and Real World performance posted by yeah true

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634259640210000000 Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:20:21 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634259640210000000 yeah true Re: Internet Explorer 9 and Real World performance @jjjjj: yes i agree ( although i wouldnt have put it like that,  i would say badly made and horrible programming practices  ) 

@yeah true: indeed, support for better alternatives should be available but as usual microsoft are forcing you to use their crappy products. Open source alternatives, HTML5 with open source codec , and/or flash for example.

 

Now to the browser video: that "test" was developed by microsoft so you can assume it is extremely optimized for ie9 ( which is cheating!!!! but not the first time microsoft have done that so whats new... example: office suite, etc... )

Second, How many undocumented ( secret ) function where used ? (Ex.  directx function for hardware acceleration)
( yes, using undocumented functions is cheating too ) 

Maybe microsoft needs another slap on the hand by EU ? For taking unfair advantage of secret undocumented functions that other browser makers doesnt have access to.

 

So unfair advantage all around,  typical microsoft tactics,

Microsoft are so bad at making competitive products that they have to cheat, now thats incompetence !

 

posted by Mr Crash

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634259853950000000 Mon, 22 Nov 2010 01:16:35 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634259853950000000 Mr Crash Re: Internet Explorer 9 and Real World performance Perhaps you didn't realize that the Sunspider benchmark is maintained by Apple, the V8 benchmark is maintained by Chrome(which ofcourse Chrome outperforms on) and the Kraken benchmark by Mozilla(which Firefox performs best on).
I'm sure you wouldn't call that "cheating" would you? Ofcourse not, you are clearly biased against Microsoft products in general and are simply trolling on this site, as are jjjj and "yeah true".
As for undocumented functions, they are all hardware acceleration functions provided by Windows and are available to both Mozilla and Chrome. Chrome doesn't support full hardware acceleration and in Chrome 8 you have to explicitly turn this on which explains it's poor performance in the Galactic test at least partially.
I find it laughable that statements like yours can be made with complete anonymity, but obviously people who wouldn't know any better may take them at face value. Normally, responses such as yours don't deserve a response, but someone has to set a few things straight...
 
 

posted by Maelstrom2

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634262243600000000 Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:39:20 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634262243600000000 Maelstrom2 Re: Internet Explorer 9 and Real World performance posted by obvious

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634263854010000000 Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:23:21 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634263854010000000 obvious Re: Internet Explorer 9 and Real World performance Internet explorer is not open source.
That should tell you something. 
There is no reason for microsoft not to fully open source the browser if they are not hiding something that is.

posted by obvious

]]> http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634263856210000000 Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:27:01 GMT http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Internet-Explorer-9-and-Real-World-performance#c634263856210000000 obvious