Charles wrote:
 | JChung2006 wrote:I'll ask the obvious: why not just call this RC1? |
Did you watch the video?
I did.
Software people tend to get silly when it comes to versioning things: alpha, beta, CTP, RC0, version 0.041a-1. You think that you're communicating useful semantic information with these obtuse, cryptic designations when a simple version 1, 2, 3, etc. would suffice.
So again, why not just call this RC1? Release Candidate means something to me. 1 means something to me. 0 means nothing to me in terms of versioning except perhaps a peculiar reluctance to commit to something being an actual release candidate, which is pretty much the opposite of what was said in the video.