<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Comment Feed for MSDN Wiki Projects - #3 - A Huge Responsibility (Rory on Channel 9)</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/rory/msdn-wiki-projects-3-a-huge-responsibility/rss/default.aspx" /><description>MSDN Wiki Projects - #3 - A Huge Responsibility</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Rory/MSDN-Wiki-Projects-3-A-Huge-Responsibility/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:19:38 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:19:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Re: MSDN Wiki Projects - #3 - A Huge Responsibility</title><description>It occurred to me only recently that the Wiki approach might be an effective way to document, at the level of detail necessary, all of the APIs and operational and configuration aspects of Microsoft products.&amp;nbsp; It does not seem reasonable to expect the corporate behemoth to undertake the task alone.&amp;nbsp; Naturally, such a Wiki would need to be closely monitored, as Wikipedia is, to limit the amount of damage done by vandals and the ill-informed.</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Rory/MSDN-Wiki-Projects-3-A-Huge-Responsibility/?CommentID=303504</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:19:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Rory/MSDN-Wiki-Projects-3-A-Huge-Responsibility/?CommentID=303504</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/303504/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>It occurred to me only recently that the Wiki approach might be an effective way to document, at the level of detail necessary, all of the APIs and operational and configuration aspects of Microsoft products.&amp;nbsp; It does not seem reasonable to expect the corporate behemoth to undertake the task&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>earnshaw</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/303504/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>