Comment Feed for Paramesh Vaidyanathan and Rico Mariani: The Future of Visual Studio Extensibility (VisualStudio on Channel 9)

Re: Paramesh Vaidyanathan and Rico Mariani: The Future of Visual Studio Extensibility

lawrencey — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:38:36 GMT

It is quite common that women usually have the desire to buy new jewelries which are seemed to be better than the old ones. Since people born under Aries are often sincere and optimistic and good at action and leadership. That is because as an indispensable decoration of clothes, jewelries are so important that they could display and highlight one's special qualities charm bracelet. Nevertheless, properly choosing of jewels is very difficult for most people. Some professional tips are in the following in the hope that they have been of some help When choosing jewels, make sure that the jewels are matched with your complexion, dresses, personalities, profession, etc. The basic rule is the shape of your jewels should be different from your face shape but couldn't be extremely opposite. If your face is an oval, you are one of the lucky ones. You will probably look good in any jewelry style or length that you are drawn to. A choker will emphasize a long neck; a long strand of pearls will lengthen your torso, or a low dangling necklace will look great with a low cut gold charm bracelet. When choosing silver links of london bracelet, make sure that they go along well with your hairstyle which is essential in the decoration of the head. A different charm exists when jeans and jackets go with jewelries in wild design. If you wear some proper gold charm bracelet when visiting your relatives and friends, your personal taste will be displayed. If your skin is in healthy color, then you'd better choose the silver links of london bracelets jewels with less lively color, such as silver, to let your skin look much better. And tall and plump women with large jewels will be more attractive since the small ones will let them look mean. The young people often focus their eyes on some brilliant and colorful charm bracelets with unique designs.

Re: Paramesh Vaidyanathan and Rico Mariani: The Future of Visual Studio Extensibility

lovecheng — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:44:34 GMT

cheap Ed Hardy Welcome to the Ed Hardy Store, Find a great range of Ed Hardy products. Ed Hardy Women's Ellerise Lowrise Sneaker · Ed Hardy Women's thanks for your post.perhaps you will like Ed Hardy handbags Ed Hardy shirts Ed Hardy clothes

Re: Paramesh Vaidyanathan and Rico Mariani: The Future of Visual Studio Extensibility

Beryl Plimmer — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:38:09 GMT

Hi guys

I know I'm a bit slow, I am really interested in what you are doing here from the perspective of being able to ink annotate over the ide - we have several failed attempts at getting this going how we would like it to. We were so frustrated with the extensiblity (or not) of ides we published a paper on it. It should be in ACM DL by now, but if not it is here http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~beryl/publications/CHINZ_2008_Issues_of_Extending_IDES.pdf

love to hear if you think it will be achievable with the new version.

cheers
Beryl

Re: Paramesh Vaidyanathan and Rico Mariani: The Future of Visual Studio Extensibility

florindonot — Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:11:53 GMT

good luck to you.

Re: Paramesh Vaidyanathan and Rico Mariani: The Future of Visual Studio Extensibility

Rico Mariani — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:32:03 GMT

Wow.

I mean, seriously, wow.

I think that's the first time I've ever been accused of lacking the vitality to say no. This is a totally new experience for me.

And that comment is also lucid and gender neutral. Mind if I borrow it for my next exec meeting?

But to your point, there are few people who lament the "kilometers of code" more than I do. This isn't something you can fix overnight but there isn't any way I'm going to allow a lack of vitality on my part to slow the process down. I promise.

Just what I needed, more pressure :)

Re: Paramesh Vaidyanathan and Rico Mariani: The Future of Visual Studio Extensibility

florindonot — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:06:08 GMT

you people have in-principle OK ideas but you lack the vitality to say NO and to cut to the relevant.
you end up with kilometers of code, which only reinforces what you are able to do today and ends up defining the status quo for everyone else. this is comfortable (and so it is understandable - there is no contempt) but there are cleaner ways forward.

Re: Paramesh Vaidyanathan and Rico Mariani: The Future of Visual Studio Extensibility

Allan Lindqvist — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:57:52 GMT

it would be cool if you could add support for a new language in your VS installation by just dropping a dll or a folder with dlls in a some directory.. i guess that would be possible with MEF but i wonder hoe far of that is :)

Re: Paramesh Vaidyanathan and Rico Mariani: The Future of Visual Studio Extensibility

Allan Lindqvist — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:27:14 GMT

cool stuff :)
i really hope the VS time are on the the backs of the wpf team to drive improvments into the platform :)
scott "the man" gu did wonderful things to the .net platform by betting on it with asp.net :)

dogfooding is a good thing and who of not a microsoft team can drive feedback into .net :)
short feedback loops are awsome :)

Re: Paramesh Vaidyanathan and Rico Mariani: The Future of Visual Studio Extensibility

Santosh Benjamin — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:30:52 GMT

Very interesting. Rico's illustration of the single threaded approach as analogous to the relay race is very good indeed. By the way, I just saw Tim Wagners PDC session on "Extending and Customizing VS" as well. It's good to see that the editor is going to be fully managed. I agree that not everything needs to move to managed code. Just the parts that devs have to interact with can be simplified.

I'd be interested to see if MPF becomes any simpler to use , or rather, if it takes less code to do things. Couple of things I have come across and have a question on whether VS10/11/x will address
(1) Istvan Novak's VSXTra library is a layer on top of MPF that I think is sorely needed. Will that be one of the things addressed in VS10 ( a simpler MPF) ?
(2) Have you seen Victor Garcia (of Clarius Consulting) post on "Simple things which are incredibly hard" where he points out a couple of areas where things that should be simple one or two lines of code end up being very long winded. I guess VSXTra will help now but again, are we taking this on board for VS10(+) ?