<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Comment Feed for WPF 3.5 SP1 Performance with Adam Smith (AdamKinney on Channel 9)</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/adamkinney/wpf-35-sp1-performance-with-adam-smith/rss/default.aspx" /><description>WPF 3.5 SP1 Performance with Adam Smith</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/AdamKinney/WPF-35-SP1-Performance-with-Adam-Smith/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 06:31:23 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 06:31:23 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Re: WPF 3.5 SP1 Performance with Adam Smith</title><description>Nice Job Adam!&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;A link to the performance improvements Adam talked about and some more details available&amp;nbsp;here:&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jgoldb/archive/2008/05/15/what-s-new-for-performance-in-wpf-in-net-3-5-sp1.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/jgoldb/archive/2008/05/15/what-s-new-for-performance-in-wpf-in-net-3-5-sp1.aspx&lt;/a&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/AdamKinney/WPF-35-SP1-Performance-with-Adam-Smith/?CommentID=404633</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 06:31:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/AdamKinney/WPF-35-SP1-Performance-with-Adam-Smith/?CommentID=404633</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/404633/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Nice Job Adam!A link to the performance improvements Adam talked about and some more details available&amp;nbsp;here:http://blogs.msdn.com/jgoldb/archive/2008/05/15/what-s-new-for-performance-in-wpf-in-net-3-5-sp1.aspx</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>jgoldb</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/404633/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: WPF 3.5 SP1 Performance with Adam Smith</title><description>&lt;P&gt;Why can't you guys remember to post a link to the LOW-RES file on every video that you do? :@&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;It's very irritating when downloading with BITS to have to wait on 600Mb files.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;---dup---dup---dup---&lt;/P&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/AdamKinney/WPF-35-SP1-Performance-with-Adam-Smith/?CommentID=403989</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:54:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/AdamKinney/WPF-35-SP1-Performance-with-Adam-Smith/?CommentID=403989</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/403989/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Why can't you guys remember to post a link to the LOW-RES file on every video that you do? :@It's very irritating when downloading with BITS to have to wait on 600Mb files.---dup---dup---dup---</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>justbitchin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/403989/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: WPF 3.5 SP1 Performance with Adam Smith</title><description>&lt;P dir=ltr&gt;Thanks for the kind words all!&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;With regards to the text rendering, did any of the DX10 specific optimizations ever arise? A long time ago, in the Avalon days, i remember there was talk of moving the text path completely to hardware in DX10 class video cards, as opposed to the mixed hardware cleartype and software glyph composition / alpha blending in DX9 paths?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR&gt;At this time, our hardware rendering is (still) DX9.&amp;nbsp; Taking advantage of geometry shaders etc is still certainly interesting, though I can't say one way or the other if/when we'll move to DX10. 
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/AdamKinney/WPF-35-SP1-Performance-with-Adam-Smith/?CommentID=403698</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:27:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/AdamKinney/WPF-35-SP1-Performance-with-Adam-Smith/?CommentID=403698</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/403698/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Thanks for the kind words all!&amp;nbsp; 
With regards to the text rendering, did any of the DX10 specific optimizations ever arise? A long time ago, in the Avalon days, i remember there was talk of moving the text path completely to hardware in DX10 class video cards, as opposed to the mixed hardware&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Adam Smith [MS]</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/403698/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: WPF 3.5 SP1 Performance with Adam Smith</title><description>This is truely excellent, really good to see this kind of thing on Channel 9.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With regards to the text rendering, did any of the DX10 specific optimizations ever arise? A long time ago, in the Avalon days, i remember there was talk of moving the text path completely to hardware in DX10 class video cards, as opposed to the mixed hardware cleartype and software glyph composition / alpha blending in DX9 paths?&lt;br&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/AdamKinney/WPF-35-SP1-Performance-with-Adam-Smith/?CommentID=403652</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:02:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/AdamKinney/WPF-35-SP1-Performance-with-Adam-Smith/?CommentID=403652</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/403652/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>This is truely excellent, really good to see this kind of thing on Channel 9.With regards to the text rendering, did any of the DX10 specific optimizations ever arise? A long time ago, in the Avalon days, i remember there was talk of moving the text path completely to hardware in DX10 class video&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>MarkPerris</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/403652/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: WPF 3.5 SP1 Performance with Adam Smith</title><description>This will be the one to re-watch when you're optimising your application, or befuddlement arises as stated by Adam because your application is slow and you don't know what the problem is. Some of the issues covered are available at; &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jgoldb/archive/2007/10/10/improving-wpf-applications-startup-time.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/jgoldb/archive/2007/10/10/improving-wpf-applications-startup-time.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Very good indeed.&lt;br&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/AdamKinney/WPF-35-SP1-Performance-with-Adam-Smith/?CommentID=403584</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:38:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/AdamKinney/WPF-35-SP1-Performance-with-Adam-Smith/?CommentID=403584</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/403584/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>This will be the one to re-watch when you're optimising your application, or befuddlement arises as stated by Adam because your application is slow and you don't know what the problem is. Some of the issues covered are available at;&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>vesuvius</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/403584/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: WPF 3.5 SP1 Performance with Adam Smith</title><description>Wow...Adam is definitely cut out for this sort of thing, good job. ;)</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/AdamKinney/WPF-35-SP1-Performance-with-Adam-Smith/?CommentID=403518</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 01:19:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/AdamKinney/WPF-35-SP1-Performance-with-Adam-Smith/?CommentID=403518</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/403518/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Wow...Adam is definitely cut out for this sort of thing, good job. ;)</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Mark Wisecarver</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/403518/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>