Posted By: scobleizer | Nov 15th, 2005 @ 9:03 PM | 134,531 Views | 22 Comments
Chris and Jeff debug one of the largest Web sites in the world: microsoft.com. Millions of pages. More traffic than Slashdot.org. A huge data farm. We have an interesting conversation about how they do it all.
Media Downloads:
Rating:
0
0
jamie
jamie
say what!?
more traffic than slashdot...   LOL!
jamie wrote:
more traffic than slashdot...   LOL!


Maybe Microsoft should slashdot, slashdot.... Tongue Out

I wonder how many times Jeff Stucky got stuck while debugging sucky code.

- Steve

More traffic than Slashdot? Is that C9's idea of understatement!

(Microsoft.com is the #4 website on the internet, behind Yahoo, MSN, and Google)

SlackmasterK
SlackmasterK
I write my OWN blogging engines

lol... 'this is a very recent build of longhorn'.... error, error, error...

'are we gonna be able to show IP addresses?'  ... 'we'll worry about that later'; lol

Scoble, I dunno if you had your saturation/luminocity settings off or what, but that bald guys' head was unusually shiny, particularly around time index 22:30.

TravisOwens
TravisOwens
Life is short, drink hard.
At around the 34min mark you mention how newspaper sites let you view old newspapers and if it's possible to view old versions of the Microsoft website.  This is apples and oranges, BUT you can view old revisions of Microsoft.com (all the way back to 1996).

The archive of old MS is at:
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://microsoft.com

They don't go to the very beginning but you can view the original MS design (infamously known as the Death Star design) from 1994 at:
http://www.useit.com/papers/1994_web_usability_report.html
DevilsRejection
DevilsRejection
addicted to rss
I really want to feel this new networking stack, the performance, everything.
TravisOwens
TravisOwens
Life is short, drink hard.
DevilsRejection wrote:
I really want to feel this new networking stack, the performance, everything.
While I haven't seen any preliminary benchmarks chances are the benefits pay off for high performance servers, I'm sure it has only a small increase for standard servers.

IOW unless you're server is pushing hundreds of transactions (ex: web hits) at the same time, you'll probably never notice the improvement.

The real benefit I'm sure relates to multiple small transactions, not a couple large transactions.  Often the bottleneck in computers is not throughput, but in the starting and stopping process.

But honestly I'm still excited because it will put to rest the whole argument that compare Linux & BSD to Windows when it comes to transactions per second, especially in the web world.

Finally, I'm sure you'll need a 64bit platform to even get the full benefit.
where do Microsoft get their weeds? i want some! perhap Microsoft should Microdotte Slashdot!
Microsoft Communities