<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Comment Feed for 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0 (10-4 on Channel 9)</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-episode-3-aspnet-webforms-40/rss/default.aspx" /><description>10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:23:07 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:23:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3599.6114, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Dull and irrelevant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=502207</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:21:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=502207</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/502207/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Dull and irrelevant.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>sarin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/502207/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Very casual and good explanation. I like it! Was just wondering which tool do you use to capture screen video with webcam view embedded. &lt;/p&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=490437</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:26:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=490437</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/490437/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Very casual and good explanation. I like it! Was just wondering which tool do you use to capture screen video with webcam view embedded. </evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Visionsoft</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/490437/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't believe people are dogging the editing of the film.&amp;nbsp; I thought the content was great and that is all that really matters to me.&amp;nbsp; I could care less if it were in black and white.&amp;nbsp; Keep putting good content in these videos and all is well with me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=476245</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:25:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=476245</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/476245/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I can't believe people are dogging the editing of the film.&amp;nbsp; I thought the content was great and that is all that really matters to me.&amp;nbsp; I could care less if it were in black and white.&amp;nbsp; Keep putting good content in these videos and all is well with me.
&amp;nbsp;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>rodttu02</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/476245/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Great clip guys :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One thing that really kinda ruine the vidoes.. Is that we HAVE to see u :D Not that your are ugly and such.. But your kinda in the way when trying to see what happens..&lt;/p&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=470577</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 07:32:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=470577</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/470577/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Great clip guys :)
One thing that really kinda ruine the vidoes.. Is that we HAVE to see u :D Not that your are ugly and such.. But your kinda in the way when trying to see what happens..</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Morten Joergensen</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/470577/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>&lt;A href="http://www.drdotnet.com/book2/drdotnet.gif" rel=lightbox&gt;&lt;IMG height=1241 src="http://www.drdotnet.com/book2/drdotnet.gif" width=704&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks a lot,&amp;nbsp; nice tips.&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;now I am writing the second&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;version of&amp;nbsp; my new book.&amp;nbsp;ASP.NET &amp;amp; XML Web Services &amp;nbsp;technology(Net Framework 4.0).&lt;BR&gt;this book is for student in the height school who are studing&amp;nbsp;Software Engineering. your tips help me.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=465725</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:41:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=465725</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/465725/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Thanks a lot,&amp;nbsp; nice tips.&amp;nbsp;now I am writing the second&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;version of&amp;nbsp; my new book.&amp;nbsp;ASP.NET &amp;amp; XML Web Services &amp;nbsp;technology(Net Framework 4.0).this book is for student in the height school who are studing&amp;nbsp;Software Engineering. your tips help me.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Joseph Ballan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/465725/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>&lt;P&gt;I have a&amp;nbsp;question.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I have a list of&amp;nbsp;linkbuttons inside a repeater.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The links&amp;nbsp;when&amp;nbsp;click&amp;nbsp;execute saved searches&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;my&amp;nbsp;app.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The links&amp;nbsp;have a command argument which is the savedSearchId.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I would like to&amp;nbsp;be able to&amp;nbsp;add new saved searches&amp;nbsp;from&amp;nbsp;the client client using&amp;nbsp;javascript.&amp;nbsp; The problem&amp;nbsp;is that&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;command&amp;nbsp;argument is stored in&amp;nbsp;ViewState which cannot be modified&amp;nbsp;in javascript.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I can&amp;nbsp;hack around this problem&amp;nbsp;but its messy.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;My&amp;nbsp;question is,&amp;nbsp;instead of&amp;nbsp;using the&amp;nbsp;command argument,&amp;nbsp; will I be able to&amp;nbsp;dynamically create&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;ClientIds to&amp;nbsp;have the&amp;nbsp;savedSearchId&amp;nbsp;suffixed at the end.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Will I then be able&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;get this information out&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;OnItemCommand&amp;nbsp;event handler?&lt;/P&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=457014</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:53:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=457014</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/457014/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I have a&amp;nbsp;question.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I have a list of&amp;nbsp;linkbuttons inside a repeater.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The links&amp;nbsp;when&amp;nbsp;click&amp;nbsp;execute saved searches&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;my&amp;nbsp;app.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The links&amp;nbsp;have a command argument which is the savedSearchId.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I would like to&amp;nbsp;be&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>ken Payson</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/457014/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>&lt;P&gt;I'm glad to hear&amp;nbsp;ASP.Net forms is alive and well.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I enjoy the&amp;nbsp;forms paridigm (I also dislike changing&amp;nbsp;paradigms every few years when&amp;nbsp;the end result of the software produced&amp;nbsp;is the same... it's nice knowing that what you're building today&amp;nbsp;can be continued tomorrow without having to make a drastic transition).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I'm excited about the ClientID changes.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;That would have been very handy in the past a few times and will give me a good oportunity to streamline some things we've done in the past.&lt;/P&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=456746</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:22:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=456746</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/456746/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I'm glad to hear&amp;nbsp;ASP.Net forms is alive and well.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I enjoy the&amp;nbsp;forms paridigm (I also dislike changing&amp;nbsp;paradigms every few years when&amp;nbsp;the end result of the software produced&amp;nbsp;is the same... it's nice knowing that what you're building today&amp;nbsp;can be continued&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>jinx101</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/456746/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>QA's Post on this Feature.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;A href="http://blog.osbornm.com/archive/2009/01/06/asp.net-4.0-clientid-overview-again.aspx"&gt;http://blog.osbornm.com/archive/2009/01/06/asp.net-4.0-clientid-overview-again.aspx&lt;/A&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=455692</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:06:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=455692</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/455692/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>QA's Post on this Feature.http://blog.osbornm.com/archive/2009/01/06/asp.net-4.0-clientid-overview-again.aspx</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Matthew M. Osborn</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/455692/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>Good presentation on ClienID features in VS2010.</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=453942</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:28:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=453942</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/453942/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Good presentation on ClienID features in VS2010.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Hafiz Muhammad Haroon Ibrahim</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/453942/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>Thank you, very nice, however it should have been&amp;nbsp;there since beginning of ASP.NET :-)</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=453443</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:53:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=453443</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/453443/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Thank you, very nice, however it should have been&amp;nbsp;there since beginning of ASP.NET :-)</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Vaclav Elias</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/453443/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Re: Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>The point is that it gives the world the distinctive impression that Microsoft's own devs are still running XP, and are planning to do so for a long time since they present their upcoming 2010 software on it. Apparently Episode IV was made on Vista a last.</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451803</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:42:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451803</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/451803/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>The point is that it gives the world the distinctive impression that Microsoft's own devs are still running XP, and are planning to do so for a long time since they present their upcoming 2010 software on it. Apparently Episode IV was made on Vista a last.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Axel Rietschin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/451803/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>Is MS struggling to afford the heating bill? :-)</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451798</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:38:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451798</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/451798/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Is MS struggling to afford the heating bill? :-)</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>LogicLabs</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/451798/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>Agreed.&amp;nbsp; Having more control over ClientID is super awesome.&amp;nbsp; Very much looking forward to it!&amp;nbsp; I think we could cut out 1/3 of the html on Channel 9 with that feature alone.&amp;nbsp; That's probably a bit of an exaggerated guess, but you get the idea.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;If you need/want complete control over the form and markup, there's always that other &lt;A href="http://asp.net/mvc"&gt;ASP.NET product&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp; :)</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451718</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:17:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451718</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/451718/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Agreed.&amp;nbsp; Having more control over ClientID is super awesome.&amp;nbsp; Very much looking forward to it!&amp;nbsp; I think we could cut out 1/3 of the html on Channel 9 with that feature alone.&amp;nbsp; That's probably a bit of an exaggerated guess, but you get the idea.If you need/want complete control&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Erik Porter</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/451718/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>&lt;P&gt;All videos on Channel 9 are downloadable.&amp;nbsp; Click on the "Downloads" link up above to see links to the different formats.&lt;/P&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451717</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:14:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451717</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/451717/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>All videos on Channel 9 are downloadable.&amp;nbsp; Click on the "Downloads" link up above to see links to the different formats.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Erik Porter</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/451717/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>Awesome video. Im struggling in my head though getting round this ID thing. btw im from a win forms bg and am somewhat new to asp.net. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Are we saying that you can use this clientID as a replacement for using javascript to get the clientID?</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451674</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:03:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451674</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/451674/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Awesome video. Im struggling in my head though getting round this ID thing. btw im from a win forms bg and am somewhat new to asp.net. Are we saying that you can use this clientID as a replacement for using javascript to get the clientID?</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Barry Andrew</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/451674/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>To: JonathanCarter&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I know the video is done in Silverlight.&amp;nbsp; Working for a State Agency, all videos are blocked.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Can you make your videos downloadable?</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451666</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:38:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451666</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/451666/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>To: JonathanCarterI know the video is done in Silverlight.&amp;nbsp; Working for a State Agency, all videos are blocked.Can you make your videos downloadable?</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>WithInTheState</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/451666/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Re: Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>Thank's Brian, and thank's too Duncan. I can embed now.&lt;br&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451622</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:34:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451622</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/451622/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Thank's Brian, and thank's too Duncan. I can embed now.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Vitor Canova Weingaertner</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/451622/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>How would this sort of thing handle a user control that contained a drop downlist which had it's Id set to static, that was then put on the page twice?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Would it throw an error or is it the developers responsibility to ensure that this dosen't happen.</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451490</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:59:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451490</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/451490/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>How would this sort of thing handle a user control that contained a drop downlist which had it's Id set to static, that was then put on the page twice?Would it throw an error or is it the developers responsibility to ensure that this dosen't happen.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>thebeebs</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/451490/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>&lt;P&gt;Good presentation. Very clear and good to understand! &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Keep up the good work.&lt;/P&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451304</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:28:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451304</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/451304/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Good presentation. Very clear and good to understand! Keep up the good work.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Mathieu Roseboom</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/451304/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>Nice to see you like the predictable feature. The tool I'm using is called the IE Developer Toolbar, and it's awesome :)&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloadS/details.aspx?familyid=E59C3964-672D-4511-BB3E-2D5E1DB91038&amp;amp;displaylang=en"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/downloadS/details.aspx?familyid=E59C3964-672D-4511-BB3E-2D5E1DB91038&amp;amp;displaylang=en&lt;/A&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451234</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:56:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451234</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/451234/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Nice to see you like the predictable feature. The tool I'm using is called the IE Developer Toolbar, and it's awesome :)http://www.microsoft.com/downloadS/details.aspx?familyid=E59C3964-672D-4511-BB3E-2D5E1DB91038&amp;amp;displaylang=en</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Jonathan Carter</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/451234/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>I'm from Florida, so it's always cold for me :)</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451231</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:54:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451231</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/451231/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I'm from Florida, so it's always cold for me :)</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Jonathan Carter</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/451231/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>I share the 'new feature == being able to do id="blah"', but I also understand why its so, and in some ways I think when webforms was being designed, ms didn't have much of a clue about what developers really wanted, ms was still very much - trust us guys you'll love our idea.. and as expected some did and bought well into it, but there was tons still that still wanted to be in control.. I think webforms is one technology that needs a completely new rethink from scratch, but that just won't happen.. nor do I care since I don't really use it.. for me actually I find asp.net and in general System.Web, are a pretty messy assembly but include so much functionality that I wouldn't dare want to try replace.. anyway, good job on enabling this- I know its one of them features webforms people sometimes really want.. although its generally much less about ids, and more about field names and controlling form targets in a better way.. (for interop with processing urls that you don't control).</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451224</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:06:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451224</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/451224/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I share the 'new feature == being able to do id="blah"', but I also understand why its so, and in some ways I think when webforms was being designed, ms didn't have much of a clue about what developers really wanted, ms was still very much - trust us guys you'll love our idea.. and as expected some&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>stevo_</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/451224/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>Wouaou ! An 18 minutes video for a feature that should be built-in for 5 years now. You guys are very slow...&lt;br&gt;What I guess is that you realized that free libs will always be better than anything you could ever made. So if you wanna use them (jQuery and Co), you must autorize the developpers to set the client ID.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't congratulate you. You're desining your evolutions to save your plateform and not to bring innovation or to make the developper work easy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When you dont want to allow integration of third party products, you close your API (clientID unsetable, and client id generated), but when you realize that your are 5 years late on third party libs, you allow integration to save your plateform.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;happy new year,&lt;br&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451209</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:18:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451209</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/451209/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Wouaou ! An 18 minutes video for a feature that should be built-in for 5 years now. You guys are very slow...What I guess is that you realized that free libs will always be better than anything you could ever made. So if you wanna use them (jQuery and Co), you must autorize the developpers to set&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Waddle</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/451209/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>Up to half of the video I'm not much impressed with the ClientID, but when it comes to the List I jumped of my chair. I bang my head when&amp;nbsp; I need to access list from javascript, and finally a relief. By the way, can anyone tell me what is the name of the tool at the bottom. I haven't found such tool in IE6.&lt;br&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451189</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:38:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451189</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/451189/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Up to half of the video I'm not much impressed with the ClientID, but when it comes to the List I jumped of my chair. I bang my head when&amp;nbsp; I need to access list from javascript, and finally a relief. By the way, can anyone tell me what is the name of the tool at the bottom. I haven't found such tool in IE6.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Vinit Yadav</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/451189/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 3: ASP.NET WebForms 4.0</title><description>Was it really cold the day you were recording this? :)</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451178</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:34:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-3-ASPNET-WebForms-40/?CommentID=451178</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/451178/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Was it really cold the day you were recording this? :)</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>rhm</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/451178/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>