<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/App_Themes/default/rss.xslt"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Comment Feed for 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010 (10-4 on Channel 9)</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-episode-5-code-focused-in-visual-studio-2010/rss/default.aspx" /><description>10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</description><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:27:42 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:27:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3608.3122, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Guess it's little late to comment on this video, nevertheless I will try to add my $.02. Selection of scope in "Call &amp;nbsp;hierarchy" should include 4th element "All open documents", similar to Search window. This makes possible to define "custom scope" of&amp;nbsp;analysis (or search)&amp;nbsp;- developer just keeps open&amp;nbsp;the files he is interested in.&lt;/p&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=483725</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:27:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=483725</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/483725/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Guess it's little late to comment on this video, nevertheless I will try to add my $.02. Selection of scope in "Call &amp;nbsp;hierarchy" should include 4th element "All open documents", similar to Search window. This makes possible to define "custom scope" of&amp;nbsp;analysis (or search)&amp;nbsp;- developer&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Bronek</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/483725/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Drew, maybe you'll read this and be able to help with an issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When you type something like if ( true ) and hit &amp;lt;enter&amp;gt; it always tabs over in case you want a single statement, but then if you do { it moves back and then you have to hit &amp;lt;enter&amp;gt; and do } then &amp;lt;up-arrow&amp;gt; then &amp;lt;enter&amp;gt; again. It would be really super duper if VS would FINALLY allow you to simply type a { and then automatically provide the } and add a new line between them tabbed over!&lt;/p&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=472339</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 17:32:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=472339</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/472339/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Drew, maybe you'll read this and be able to help with an issue.
When you type something like if ( true ) and hit &amp;lt;enter&amp;gt; it always tabs over in case you want a single statement, but then if you do { it moves back and then you have to hit &amp;lt;enter&amp;gt; and do } then &amp;lt;up-arrow&amp;gt; then&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>MT</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/472339/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Where is the PianoKeys adornment sample located at?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can't seem to find it anywhere.&lt;/p&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=470159</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 23:48:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=470159</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/470159/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Where is the PianoKeys adornment sample located at?
I can't seem to find it anywhere.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Daveee</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/470159/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>New&amp;nbsp;"Generate This" functionality is so cool!!&amp;nbsp; I will write article on this in VSTS2010.net which is a team blog for VSTS2010 in Korea and introduce this new cool functionality to Korean Developers. Thanks for nice job.</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=465060</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:50:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=465060</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/465060/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>New&amp;nbsp;"Generate This" functionality is so cool!!&amp;nbsp; I will write article on this in VSTS2010.net which is a team blog for VSTS2010 in Korea and introduce this new cool functionality to Korean Developers. Thanks for nice job.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>kkongchi</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/465060/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>From what I've seen so far, my favorites are:&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Highlight references-this is intiuitive and subtle but will be a big help.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;The code navigation features-I'm always interested in easier ways to navigate projects and solutions.&amp;nbsp; Who wants to waste time clicking around.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Code editor extensibility-This will encourage the general public to create code editor improvements that are like Wordpress plugins for the code editor.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Keep the videos coming.&lt;/P&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=462487</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 05:37:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=462487</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/462487/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>From what I've seen so far, my favorites are:

Highlight references-this is intiuitive and subtle but will be a big help.
The code navigation features-I'm always interested in easier ways to navigate projects and solutions.&amp;nbsp; Who wants to waste time clicking around.
Code editor&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Ted Kolovos</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/462487/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>&lt;P&gt;I guess I won't be paying for the next upgrade to Resharper! Oh well,&amp;nbsp;it was a&amp;nbsp;good company while it lasted.&amp;nbsp;I hope you guys at least offered jobs to the lead developers&amp;nbsp;from JetBrains.&lt;/P&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=460759</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:56:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=460759</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/460759/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I guess I won't be paying for the next upgrade to Resharper! Oh well,&amp;nbsp;it was a&amp;nbsp;good company while it lasted.&amp;nbsp;I hope you guys at least offered jobs to the lead developers&amp;nbsp;from JetBrains.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>kicker3082</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/460759/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>&lt;P&gt;Very Notepad++ and JetBrains Re-Sharper.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I like the quicksearch, but one thing that I would still like to see (and haven't seen yet - or got hold of the CTP) is a function outline view for javascript files. Something like the drop down list for selecting methods in a code file and like the outline view in Aptana. Working with Javascript files in Visual Studio is still a pain.&lt;/P&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=459501</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 07:20:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=459501</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/459501/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Very Notepad++ and JetBrains Re-Sharper.
I like the quicksearch, but one thing that I would still like to see (and haven't seen yet - or got hold of the CTP) is a function outline view for javascript files. Something like the drop down list for selecting methods in a code file and like the outline&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>GadgetGeek</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/459501/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>I think the colored tabs would be pretty useful. Group them by colors. And have that match up with a project or folder or in a project, etc... I like that MS is giving us the tools to customize our development environments fairly easily. And there is no sense in MS bloating the application for everyone with all these options, when all these customizations are really based on the developer's preferences anyway. You put in what you need or what you like, while keeping Visual Studio lighter for the core application.&lt;br&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=458143</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:31:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=458143</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/458143/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I think the colored tabs would be pretty useful. Group them by colors. And have that match up with a project or folder or in a project, etc... I like that MS is giving us the tools to customize our development environments fairly easily. And there is no sense in MS bloating the application for&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Ottone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/458143/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Re: Re: Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>&lt;P&gt;Drew,&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I think that&amp;nbsp;the comment was a valid one.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;We understand that&amp;nbsp;you are aiming to&amp;nbsp;keep the videos&amp;nbsp;casual, but at the end of the day you are representing a larger entity than yourself.&amp;nbsp;I don't believe that anyone is asking you to&amp;nbsp;change how you work,&amp;nbsp;nor the environment that best suits your&amp;nbsp;needs, my office also&amp;nbsp;bears a resemblance to a&amp;nbsp;dorm room, however&amp;nbsp;when providing a showcase for&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;product&amp;nbsp;on which&amp;nbsp;I am working,&amp;nbsp;it would&amp;nbsp;look&amp;nbsp;very&amp;nbsp;amateurish&amp;nbsp;and unprofessional&amp;nbsp;if I were&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;bring my intended audience into&amp;nbsp;"my world".&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I believe the point being made was a constructive criticism, to some&amp;nbsp;the college logo is obviously a distraction, and&amp;nbsp;since you now work for Microsoft and not your college, perhaps&amp;nbsp;a Microsoft Logo might be a little more appropriate.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;With that said ... great video, thanks for the insight and keep up the good work&amp;nbsp;:o)&lt;/P&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=457725</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:34:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=457725</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/457725/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Drew,I think that&amp;nbsp;the comment was a valid one.&amp;nbsp;We understand that&amp;nbsp;you are aiming to&amp;nbsp;keep the videos&amp;nbsp;casual, but at the end of the day you are representing a larger entity than yourself.&amp;nbsp;I don't believe that anyone is asking you to&amp;nbsp;change how you work,&amp;nbsp;nor the&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Bill Richards</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/457725/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>An interesting video on several counts: highlights of VS2010 code navigation improvements, an illustration of TDD style and how VS2010 will support that style, and the slick Silverlight presentation that excellently combined the presentation with the presenter video and 3D effects. Nice work and thanks.&lt;br&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=457471</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:28:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=457471</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/457471/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>An interesting video on several counts: highlights of VS2010 code navigation improvements, an illustration of TDD style and how VS2010 will support that style, and the slick Silverlight presentation that excellently combined the presentation with the presenter video and 3D effects. Nice work and thanks.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>nzkeith</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/457471/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>What I would love to see in Visual Studio in the future is the ability to use the editor as a "worksheet". Maybe the use of WPF to render the editing surface may allow this?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;An excellent example of this is Mathematica&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathematica/index.html"&gt;http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathematica/index.html&lt;/A&gt;. Regions of the page are code, regions are interactive, and regions are presentation output.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;In Visual Studio we could use this concept to include unit test results or generated HTML documentation. Imagine if you could have an interactive grid inline in the editor that you could use to test functionality of the method you're working on. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Obviously there are plenty of times when this kind of bloat is undesirable, but I think it could be fantastic where you need code to be highly documented.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;In terms of the source, it could probably be added into the existing triple-slash XML comment system. Visual Studio could optionally render these features (allow it to be switched off for performance), other editors would see comments only.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=457283</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:54:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=457283</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/457283/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>What I would love to see in Visual Studio in the future is the ability to use the editor as a "worksheet". Maybe the use of WPF to render the editing surface may allow this?An excellent example of this is Mathematica&amp;nbsp;http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathematica/index.html. Regions of the page&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Andy Cook</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/457283/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>On the unit testing features, have you considered having an "extension method" on non existent methods or classes that is called Generate. When you hit tab VS would then generate the method. Saves have to hit CTRL+. which would make it faster than you would think.&lt;div&gt;Also not sure if it's great to navigate directly to the new method/class when its generated. You might want to just continue writing code.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Also with MEF is there a good debugging experience. I noticed that you had to close VS and then drop the DLL in the folder.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Is there no F5 experience for MEF at the moment?&lt;/div&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=456707</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 04:35:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=456707</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/456707/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>On the unit testing features, have you considered having an "extension method" on non existent methods or classes that is called Generate. When you hit tab VS would then generate the method. Saves have to hit CTRL+. which would make it faster than you would think.Also not sure if it's great to&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>jonathanp</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/456707/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>My thoughts:&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Variable navigation:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;You could have a popup when selecting a variable which shows you the usages of that variable. Like a smart tag.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;div&gt;Callsites&lt;/div&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Callsites should be integrated into the call hierachy. When you double click on a method in the call hierarchy you are taken to the first call site in that method. F3 gets you to other call sites. Or just make call sites another node in the call hierarchy!&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;When you change the scope of the call hierarchy&lt;br&gt;	1) Having to manually hit refresh should be a VS option setting. The default should be auto unless it is too slow. If it's too slow then the items should load incrementally.&lt;br&gt;	2) When (if) you click refresh you should not have to re-expand the treeview. All nodes that were expanded that haven't been removed from the tree (due to the new scope) should still be expanded and the selected node (if it's still in the tree) should be selected. If not the next highest node should be selected.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;div&gt;CTRL+,&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Camel case is good but should also have an option for full-text-search which doesn't require camel case queries.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;There shouldn't be a progress bar. Just load the results as they are found. ESC should cancel and hide the popup.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Should be able to right click on result and open containing folder, delete, rename. You'll have to think about differentiating between 1-1 class file mappings and 1-* file - class mappings. If it's a class then maybe rename. Also Call Hierarchy right-click menu item would be good!&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hiding full constructor method signatures should be a user setting. Probably default to on.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;div&gt;Generally (this may be already possible) I'd love for keyboard shortcuts for:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Close current file&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Close all files&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Close all but this&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Open recent file.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=456704</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 03:58:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=456704</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/456704/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>My thoughts:Variable navigation:You could have a popup when selecting a variable which shows you the usages of that variable. Like a smart tag.CallsitesCallsites should be integrated into the call hierachy. When you double click on a method in the call hierarchy you are taken to the first call site&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>jonathanp</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/456704/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>I agree there is more that could be in the IDE and the new extensibility will make it easier to add those features. The trick is finding the broadly applicable features and get them out of the box and then allow developers to add the tools they are comfortable using. I find that devs tend to be very passionate about those tool choices, based on their style, what they build, etc.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Enjoyed reading through your articles. &lt;BR&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=455467</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:03:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=455467</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/455467/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I agree there is more that could be in the IDE and the new extensibility will make it easier to add those features. The trick is finding the broadly applicable features and get them out of the box and then allow developers to add the tools they are comfortable using. I find that devs tend to be very&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Drew Robbins</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/455467/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>&lt;div&gt;Hi&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;I think we need a more revolutionary editing ideas. It has no Xfactor! At least the extensibility will possibly make some of the following features possible.&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;What about ?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;CodeBaking http://tinyurl.com/bdfhcx&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Code Snippets should have context http://tinyurl.com/aovnnl&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Abstract the codefile from the language http://tinyurl.com/cs77mc&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;More CodeGen, and 1 reason why CodeGen does not get used as much as it should&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;(why is it not integrated with RTE?)  http://tinyurl.com/dle6cm&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Jonathan&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=455456</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:25:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=455456</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/455456/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>HiI think we need a more revolutionary editing ideas. It has no Xfactor! At least the extensibility will possibly make some of the following features possible.What about ?CodeBaking http://tinyurl.com/bdfhcxCode Snippets should have context http://tinyurl.com/aovnnlAbstract the codefile from the&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Jamon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/455456/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>&lt;div&gt;Hi&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;I think we need a more revolutionary editing ideas. It has no Xfactor! At least the extensibility will possibly make some of the following features possible.&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;What about ?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;CodeBaking http://tinyurl.com/bdfhcx&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Code Snippets should have context http://tinyurl.com/aovnnl&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Abstract the codefile from the language http://tinyurl.com/cs77mc&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;More CodeGen, and 1 reason why CodeGen does not get used as much as it should&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;(why is it not integrated with RTE?)  http://tinyurl.com/dle6cm&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Jonathan&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=455455</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:24:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=455455</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/455455/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>HiI think we need a more revolutionary editing ideas. It has no Xfactor! At least the extensibility will possibly make some of the following features possible.What about ?CodeBaking http://tinyurl.com/bdfhcxCode Snippets should have context http://tinyurl.com/aovnnlAbstract the codefile from the&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Jamon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/455455/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>1.) Yes please stop the PIP or find a better position. You often cant read anything.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.) I dont think its a good idea to use hundreds of external tools. The most important features should be included in VS directly. If there is a nice feature that another application used, then why not copy it. On the other side I dont see a problem if someone else copies a feature of VS like Java did with the for each loop from C#.&lt;br&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454926</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:59:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454926</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/454926/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>1.) Yes please stop the PIP or find a better position. You often cant read anything.2.) I dont think its a good idea to use hundreds of external tools. The most important features should be included in VS directly. If there is a nice feature that another application used, then why not copy it. On&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>andrgin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/454926/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>&lt;P&gt;I have been using ReSharper only for 5 days and I can see some nice benefits&amp;nbsp;but in my opinion most of them were supposed to be in Visual Studio anyway. Visual Studio evolves :-), demands increase and new features will be implemented in Visual Studio anyway if there is ReSharper or not and even the features are same or similar... :-)&lt;/P&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454663</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:51:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454663</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/454663/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I have been using ReSharper only for 5 days and I can see some nice benefits&amp;nbsp;but in my opinion most of them were supposed to be in Visual Studio anyway. Visual Studio evolves :-), demands increase and new features will be implemented in Visual Studio anyway if there is ReSharper or not and even&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Vaclav Elias</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/454663/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>Well it's nice, again, &amp;nbsp;to see VS2010 embracing (borrowing) the nice features from others.&lt;BR&gt;If you have any experience with ReSharper from JetBrain, you will see what a huge COPY has MS made this time...&lt;BR&gt;anyway, as a MS Dev, there is nothing to lose though ... ;-)</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454482</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:00:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454482</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/454482/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Well it's nice, again, &amp;nbsp;to see VS2010 embracing (borrowing) the nice features from others.If you have any experience with ReSharper from JetBrain, you will see what a huge COPY has MS made this time...anyway, as a MS Dev, there is nothing to lose though ... ;-)</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Solarding</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/454482/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>The quick search feature is handy. As you probably know, IDEA does all this and more. In particular, what IDEA does is display the fully qualified name or path in parantheses, so that similarly named files in different directories may be differentiated. It would be good for Studio developers to have the same feature.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;PS - I don't think there's any harm in promoting your sports team. Hey, it just &lt;EM&gt;happened&lt;/EM&gt; to be on your wall. :)</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454411</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:14:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454411</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/454411/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>The quick search feature is handy. As you probably know, IDEA does all this and more. In particular, what IDEA does is display the fully qualified name or path in parantheses, so that similarly named files in different directories may be differentiated. It would be good for Studio developers to have&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Adarsh Bhat</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/454411/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure why the lower quality version got linked again - I originally had the high quality version set. I switched it back and you should have clear video again like before. Thanks for catching that.&lt;/P&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454351</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:58:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454351</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/454351/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I'm not sure why the lower quality version got linked again - I originally had the high quality version set. I switched it back and you should have clear video again like before. Thanks for catching that.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Drew Robbins</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/454351/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>I found the video very blurry.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The others were crystal clear.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I agree, the logo and the large PIP is distracting -- plus a 4th of the IDE is hidden by the PIP.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Please stop using the PIP!&lt;BR&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454299</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:03:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454299</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/454299/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>I found the video very blurry.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The others were crystal clear.I agree, the logo and the large PIP is distracting -- plus a 4th of the IDE is hidden by the PIP.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Please stop using the PIP!</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>dm3281</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/454299/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>1.) I think its better to concentrate on the content and not on the quality of the video. If I like a professional marketing video I go to Youtube and watch Steve Ballmer (developers, developers, developers) :D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.) Is there a way to change the color of the marked references, because in the current color I cant see anything.&lt;br&gt;I love huge monitors, but unfortunately you can only get them with a cheap TN Panel if you dont want to pay &amp;gt;1K $. So I can not really decide between white and a very light gray like in this case (tested with my 28" Hanns.G at home, but also with my cheap standard 22" Acer monitor at work), if you are looking from the wrong side and I think I am not the only one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3.) Making the editor in WPF is a good thing. I love this new zooming function. I was searching for this the whole time (and maybe also buy larger monitors to get more resolution and more code on the screen).&lt;br&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454275</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:40:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454275</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/454275/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>1.) I think its better to concentrate on the content and not on the quality of the video. If I like a professional marketing video I go to Youtube and watch Steve Ballmer (developers, developers, developers) :D2.) Is there a way to change the color of the marked references, because in the current&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>andrgin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/454275/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>How rude to keep these videos casual!! :-) ha ha&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thank you, all sounds good!! Well Done! &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I think I suggested already on one Microsoft's website&amp;nbsp;(in 1874) to have the optional coloured editor's tabs so when you work with more projects it would be easier to recognize quickly where the opened document belongs to..&amp;nbsp;not sure if it makes sence to anybody ha ha&amp;nbsp;:-)&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.vaclavelias.com/Projects/visualstudio10/VisualStudio10Editor.jpg"&gt;http://www.vaclavelias.com/Projects/visualstudio10/VisualStudio10Editor.jpg&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.vaclavelias.com/Projects/visualstudio10/VisualStudio10Editor.jpg" rel=lightbox&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" src="http://www.vaclavelias.com/Projects/visualstudio10/VisualStudio10Editor.jpg" width=600&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Cheers, Vaclav.</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454185</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:25:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454185</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/454185/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>How rude to keep these videos casual!! :-) ha haThank you, all sounds good!! Well Done! I think I suggested already on one Microsoft's website&amp;nbsp;(in 1874) to have the optional coloured editor's tabs so when you work with more projects it would be easier to recognize quickly where the opened&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Vaclav Elias</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/454185/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: 10-4 Episode 5: Code Focused in Visual Studio 2010</title><description>When I heard of the 'new editor' in WPF I was a little bit shocked. because after all, it is a code editor.&amp;nbsp;So there's no need for fancy things like gradients and pictures.&amp;nbsp;But this video made it a lot clearer. Though it is a CTP, I hope that the editor will be as good as the plain old RichTextBox. (For example tooltips look horrible now as well as some flickering when selecting text)&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;But the extensibility of it is great. Especially the usage of MEF. I'm playing arround with MEF a little bit and it looks very very promising. I like the other features, like the navigation, as well!&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454170</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:57:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/10-4/10-4-Episode-5-Code-Focused-in-Visual-Studio-2010/?CommentID=454170</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://channel9.msdn.com/454170/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>When I heard of the 'new editor' in WPF I was a little bit shocked. because after all, it is a code editor.&amp;nbsp;So there's no need for fancy things like gradients and pictures.&amp;nbsp;But this video made it a lot clearer. Though it is a CTP, I hope that the editor will be as good as the plain old&amp;#8230;</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Mathieu Roseboom</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://channel9.msdn.com/454170/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>