Posted By: Ron Jacobs | Jul 29th @ 11:03 AM | 59,498 Views | 4 Comments
Windows Workflow Foundation in .NET 4 makes it easy to build and consume web services.  In this episode I'll take you through the Introduction to Workflow Services lab from the Visual Studio 2010 Training Kit.  Where you will learn about some cool new features such as content based correlation.
Rating:
0
0

For me Workflow services is a mixed bag, there are few things I’m not willing to trade off :

-Contract First: it’s just awkward, I want be able to declare the service contract and then pick the operation to implement in the receive shape.

-I want to be able to group workflows as service operations instead of independent services, for example in the video you have HRService, what if I want to have a single  workflow for process the application , other dedicated to check the application status, other for vacation request, other for raise request, other for complains  and so on, all related to HRServices however I can’t host all of  them under http://localhost:8080/HRservices and “see” them as operations( ProcessApplication, CheckApplicationStatus, VacationRequest, RaiseRequest, Complains )  I’ll have to host each of them under different addresses and treat them as separate services, in other words I’ll end up having for example:

 http://localhost:8080/ProcessApplication

http://localhost:8081/CheckApplicationStatus

http://localhost:8082/VacationRequest

http://localhost:8083/RaiseRequest

http://localhost:8083/Complains

To accomplish the desire functionality (single service many operation) today we have to use parallel/ pick shapes which again doesn’t feel natural.

Just my thoughts, other than that; thanks and keep up the good work

Enrique G.

aL_
aL_
Rx ftw

cool stuff Smiley but the vb only syntax just ruins it for me.. when i have a c# project i want to write c#. imo the workflow syntax should be whatever the project language is..

as for intellisense, can you use the editor that vs uses? it has c# intellisense, so compiler as a service cant be a requisite there Smiley

this would seem av even better option in vs10 with its MEF:ed componentization..

 

anyhow, i see WF as something that could have great potential for prototyping / service orchestration and such, i do however see it as something devs will use, not "excel types" as they will hand things over to a dev anyway as soon as visual studio is mentioned Smiley with VB force feeding however i dont see WF4 hitting the (non VB)dev main stream im sad to say :/

 

Hey Ron,

 

great stuff ... BUT ... 

 

where have your doors in the background gone to? Between Part 1 and Part 2 ???

 

FUNNY :O)

Hi Ron, this is great. But it's not in VS2010 Training Kit. Where can I get it?

Microsoft Communities