Jorgen Thelin on the Microsoft Federation Gateway
- Posted: Aug 28, 2009 at 1:52 PM
- 41,272 Views
- 3 Comments
Loading User Information from Channel 9
Something went wrong getting user information from Channel 9
Loading User Information from MSDN
Something went wrong getting user information from MSDN
Loading Visual Studio Achievements
Something went wrong getting the Visual Studio Achievements
Right click “Save as…”
Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to continue the conversation,
please create a new thread in our Forums,
or
Contact Us and let us know.
Follow the Discussion
Oops, something didn't work.
What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in. You need to be signed in to Channel 9 to use this feature.What does this mean?
Following an item on Channel 9 allows you to watch for new content and comments that you are interested in and view them all on your notifications page.sign up for email notifications?
great work.
Question... where does ACS fit in.
I see how MFG helps you reduce the complexity of establishing trust relationships with multiple IPs.
But inside my application or RP i would need to have logic to differentiate between people from IPx , LiveID or IPy.
Would ACS fit in here between the MFG and RP.. mapping all incoming claims to some normalized set that my app or organization understands.
If so wondering why this was not mentioned.
thanks.
Yes, ACS fits in nicely between MFG and the RP, as you suggest.
I find it useful to think of ACS in one of two ways in relation to MFG, depending on which perspetive I am coming at it from:
In general, an app will always have some kind of authorization / permissioning logic somewhere -- and whether that be provided by the app itself or offloaded to ACS is a design choice that is pretty much completely invisible to MFG.
Hope this helps explain the relationshiop between MFG and ACS.
- Jorgen
Am I correct that the MFG is an FP-STS and it is never an IP-STS? From watching the video, it sounds like the actual IdP is never the MFG, but the MFG has the capability to federate with thousands or even millions of IP-STSs (a WS-Federation/WS-Trust thunking layer for the IdP). Because of its tight relationship with LiveID, an IP-STS, it seems like the MFG gets improperly called an IP-STS or IdP sometimes when it is in fact not. If I am correct here, it would be helpful to call the MFG an FP-STS when describing it because many of us have this frame of reference, making this technology easier to come to terms with.
The eventual support for SAML 2 and interoperability with PingFederate will be fantastic. Looking forward to that.
Great video. Thanks for taking the time to produce it.
Remove this comment
Remove this thread
close