http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/Dev/App_Themes/C9/images/feedimage.pnghttp://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Microsoft+Conversations+with+J/A-conversation-with-John-Lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-Silverlight-and-Ruby/A conversation with John Lam about the dynamic language runtime, Silverlight, and Rubyhttp://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Microsoft+Conversations+with+J/A-conversation-with-John-Lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-Silverlight-and-Ruby/en-usTue, 22 May 2007 16:51:41 GMTTue, 22 May 2007 16:51:41 GMTEvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3599.6114, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)Jon.<br><br>As always, an interesting and informative conversation.<br><br>I listened to this in the car, so I needed it turned up for the quiet parts. But the volume variability was <b>a lot</b>.<br><br>Have you tried The Levelator from Gigavox? It does a really <i>nice</i> job of levelling the volumes. And when you've got phone conversation the resulting podcast is just great. And the price is right!<br><br>Maybe you'd consider it for future podcasts?<br><br>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Microsoft+Conversations+with+J/A-conversation-with-John-Lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-Silverlight-and-Ruby/?CommentID=311580Tue, 22 May 2007 16:51:41 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Microsoft+Conversations+with+J/A-conversation-with-John-Lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-Silverlight-and-Ruby/?CommentID=3115800http://channel9.msdn.com/311580/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Jon.As always, an interesting and informative conversation.I listened to this in the car, so I needed it turned up for the quiet parts. But the volume variability was a lot.Have you tried The Levelator from Gigavox? It does a really nice job of levelling the volumes. And when you've got phone&#8230;bernard.farrell0http://channel9.msdn.com/311580/Trackback.aspxExcellent podcast. Packed with great info. I learned a lot but was most excited to hear you talk about using the DLR and languages like Ruby outside of&nbsp;Silverlight. I'd gotten it into my head that&nbsp;using one required the other. Not true. Nothing at all against Silverlight, but being able to run Ruby inside of a DLR implementation of the Rails framework (which will no doubt come along shortly)&nbsp;while having external access to the .NET framework... Holy cow!http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Microsoft+Conversations+with+J/A-conversation-with-John-Lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-Silverlight-and-Ruby/?CommentID=308183Sat, 05 May 2007 19:01:17 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Microsoft+Conversations+with+J/A-conversation-with-John-Lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-Silverlight-and-Ruby/?CommentID=3081830http://channel9.msdn.com/308183/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Excellent podcast. Packed with great info. I learned a lot but was most excited to hear you talk about using the DLR and languages like Ruby outside of&nbsp;Silverlight. I'd gotten it into my head that&nbsp;using one required the other. Not true. Nothing at all against Silverlight, but being able to&#8230;dannykboyd0http://channel9.msdn.com/308183/Trackback.aspxThat looks quite interesting.<br> <br> I’d like to hear more details about the DLR and how it could be used outside of Silverlight.<br> <br> I’m particularly curious about your IDE ideas for dynamic languages and I’m wondering if it would be possible to use languages that are traditionally image based like Self or Smalltalk in .NET.<br> <br> I'm also curious to see what changed in the dynamic versions of javascript and vb.<br>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Microsoft+Conversations+with+J/A-conversation-with-John-Lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-Silverlight-and-Ruby/?CommentID=307287Thu, 03 May 2007 04:02:21 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Microsoft+Conversations+with+J/A-conversation-with-John-Lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-Silverlight-and-Ruby/?CommentID=3072870http://channel9.msdn.com/307287/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0That looks quite interesting. I’d like to hear more details about the DLR and how it could be used outside of Silverlight. I’m particularly curious about your IDE ideas for dynamic languages and I’m wondering if it would be possible to use languages that are traditionally image based like Self&#8230;R4p70r0http://channel9.msdn.com/307287/Trackback.aspxNobody would take our implementation seriously if it doesn't run Rails. But we've only been working on this for 4 weeks ...http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Microsoft+Conversations+with+J/A-conversation-with-John-Lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-Silverlight-and-Ruby/?CommentID=307667Wed, 02 May 2007 16:32:30 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Microsoft+Conversations+with+J/A-conversation-with-John-Lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-Silverlight-and-Ruby/?CommentID=3076670http://channel9.msdn.com/307667/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Nobody would take our implementation seriously if it doesn't run Rails. But we've only been working on this for 4 weeks ...john_lam0http://channel9.msdn.com/307667/Trackback.aspxalso check out a video interview:&nbsp;<a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=304924>http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=304924</a>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Microsoft+Conversations+with+J/A-conversation-with-John-Lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-Silverlight-and-Ruby/?CommentID=307571Wed, 02 May 2007 08:03:43 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Microsoft+Conversations+with+J/A-conversation-with-John-Lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-Silverlight-and-Ruby/?CommentID=3075710http://channel9.msdn.com/307571/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0also check out a video interview:&nbsp;http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=304924skeezicks0http://channel9.msdn.com/307571/Trackback.aspxIs the "DLR" version of Ruby good enough to run Rails?<br><br>http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Microsoft+Conversations+with+J/A-conversation-with-John-Lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-Silverlight-and-Ruby/?CommentID=307533Wed, 02 May 2007 00:00:39 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Microsoft+Conversations+with+J/A-conversation-with-John-Lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-Silverlight-and-Ruby/?CommentID=3075330http://channel9.msdn.com/307533/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Is the "DLR" version of Ruby good enough to run Rails?Cairo0http://channel9.msdn.com/307533/Trackback.aspx