Rx API in depth: Hot and Cold observables

Download this episode

Download Video

Description

In this episode of the Rx API in depth, Wes talks talks about hot and cold Observables.

Visit the Reactive Extensions DevLabs page to download and learn more about Rx.

Embed

Format

Available formats for this video:

Actual format may change based on video formats available and browser capability.

    The Discussion

    • User profile image
      tomkirbygre​en

      I'm amazed there don't appear to be any so-called early-access / alpha books on Rx coming from Manning or APress. At least they're not listed yet. I'd really like to find something longer than 'just' a couple of blog postings that really digs into specifically Rx and reactive programming in general in .NET. These videos are great and I'm very grateful they're being make available, however for study purposes nothing beats the one-to-one, deep dive that the printed word delivers. Does anyone know when we might see a Rx book?

    • User profile image
      head.in.the.​box

      That is one of my new year's resolutions. 

    • User profile image
      Bjorg

      I'm curious, what is the origin of the terms "hot" and "cold?"  Were other terms considered like "static" vs. "dynamic," or "immutable" vs. "mutable?"

    • User profile image
      Wes Dyer

      Hot = Running

      Cold = Not Running

       

      Static/Dynamic would be misleading.  Immutable/Mutable is also misleading.  Perhaps, the closest terms are Deferred / Not-Deferred or Latent / Active.

       

      The terms Hot and Cold came from whiteboarding and design sessions where we needed a term to describe the difference between something that running versus something that represents a thing that can be run.  We definitely didn't sit down and figure out a vocabulary, these things just happen.  I'm sure that at some point in time people will think about standard terminology, but we usually can't wait for that to happen.

    • User profile image
      LeeCampbell

      As Wes mentioned above, I like to think of them as 

      Hot = Active

      Cold = Passive.

       

      I think we can do better than the explanation JVG gives here.

    • User profile image
      LeeCampbell

      Ok instead of being part of the problem I thought I would put my 2c in. Angel

       

      Here is my post on Hot vs Cold Observables.

       

      http://leecampbell.blogspot.com/2010/08/rx-part-7-hot-and-cold-observables.html

       

    • User profile image
      ghd

      This is a very nice site.I like it very much!

    Comments closed

    Comments have been closed since this content was published more than 30 days ago, but if you'd like to send us feedback you can Contact Us.